User talk:Cppcat

Swami Pranabananda

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Swami Pranabananda, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/bharatsevashramsangh/yugacharya.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

{{hangon}} The same entity from the geocities.com is trying to create an improved version of the article in the wikipedia where there are no similar articles found to exist. Hence we are trying to create three different articles from the one that we have in geocities.com - two of the articles for the Swami Pranabananda ji (the founder Hindu Saint) and one for this philanthropic organization. There are no copy right violation it taking place. For further clarifications, I can be reached at cppcat@hotmail.com. I strongly disagree with Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion of Swami Pranabananda

A tag has been placed on Swami Pranabananda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.    SIS  00:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

{{hangon}} The same entity from the geocities.com is trying to create an improved version of the article in the wikipedia where there are no similar articles found to exist. Hence we are trying to create three different articles from the one that we have in geocities.com - two of the articles for the Swami Pranabananda ji (the founder Hindu Saint) and one for this philanthropic organization. There are no copy right violation it taking place. For further clarifications, I can be reached at cppcat@hotmail.com. I strongly disagree with Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion of Swami Pranabananda ji maharaj

A tag has been placed on Swami Pranabananda ji maharaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.    SIS  00:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

{{hangon}} The same entity from the geocities.com is trying to create an improved version of the article in the wikipedia where there are no similar articles found to exist. Hence we are trying to create three different articles from the one that we have in geocities.com - two of the articles for the Swami Pranabananda ji (the founder Hindu Saint) and one for this philanthropic organization. There are no copy right violation it taking place. For further clarifications, I can be reached at cppcat@hotmail.com. I strongly disagree with Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion.

advice

quite apart from considerations of copyvio, this is an encyclopedia, not a web page. The subjects of the articles have accomplishments that can be demonstrated by published sources, 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases), I recognize that it may be difficult for figures distinguished by their spiritual merit in earlier generations than the present to show such sources, but still they must be present. If you can find such published sources, any language, but from sources independent of him or his fellowship, then feel free to re-create an article. You've got to show that the world knows bout him outside his own group--if not, it counts as publicity. He may deserve the publicity, but this is not the place for it, and it just won't be suitable here. DGG (talk) 02:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Response

I do not understand how do you think a non-christen can write about Jesus (refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_christ) in Wikipedia? Only a follower can write about a subject or about the personality otherwise it will end up in misinformation that you had already demonstrated by re-writing my article on "Bharat Sevasharm Sangha" by calling it as a Buddhist organization! No where in the wiki I could find the clause that you mentioned in you comment. Hence please do not try to edit what you are ignorant about.

Your insertion of blatant promotional material in Bharat Sevashram Sangha

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bharat Sevashram Sangha, you will be blocked from editing. Pegasus «C¦T» 16:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

What would you call this for Jesus - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus ???... Mohammad - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamad? and above all Pope?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope Shall I keep going??? According to your logic all these should be deleted.

The Jesus article is described as "Jesus has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria." I agree w/ this comment. On the same ground my article is equally good Philosophy and religion article. If you decline, then you have to undo what you said about the "Jesus" article and delete all of them as each of these are propaganda too. Read the comments from one of the readers in the comment section.

It is you who is violating the Wiki norm by putting spam (false information) and rewriting news from a wired news paper (The Telegraph) and secondly calling it a Buddhist organization. I studied the NPOV, and I found nothing conflicting against what I'm doing here. I'm putting an authentic historic article about an organization which I know well, and which many others are interested in knowing well... I happily let others (of course not people like you who would google to find texts to frame comments) change! STOP calling it a blatant promotional material without knowing anything about it!

Last warning: Replacement of sourced material with unsourced

Well if I do not consider your additions promotional, then it is certainly unsourced and unverifiable. Replacing content that has sources, with content that violates the neutral point of view and is unsourced, still equals to vandalism. Please stop replacing the article with unsourced material, or you will be blocked from editing. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Elonka 04:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

STOP threatening... It looks like communist China not wiki!!! I never knew wiki is so poorly administrated!! Cppcat (talk)

I am a volunteer Wikipedia administrator. My attention was drawn to the Bharat Sevashram Sangha article because we have tools that alert us when there is an edit war somewhere. The WP:3RR rule is taken very seriously. For best results, please be very polite when you participate on Wikipedia. We have policies that require civility. See also Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you are rude, your account access may be blocked, so please be careful. --Elonka 05:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

: Administrators come in random numbers and replace my article (built in wiki:goodfaith) by bunch of trash and false information w/o any argument which I revert it. One administrator moderates as basis, other does not agree, one accepts image copyright clarification and other (YOU) come and DELETE the image w/o a citation. This is what your buggy tool fails to catch and resolves it wrongly w/ partial conclusion (edit war). This happening again and again is enough to make me conclude that Wiki is a wild lawless forest w/ UNEDUCATED HUGELY BIASED predators. Sorry to say, I'm quitting wiki and I'll keep spreading my wiki-experiences thru large web communities....

A request

Hi

It would be great if you sould post Swami Pranabananda's speeches, sayings, poems and his major works on Wikisource:Authors -- for general public use.

Regards,

Patoldanga'r Tenida (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)