User talk:Cprice1000/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Fix

I just changed a bit of your user talk page (this page) so that it would no longer display as a long string of text down the left side of the page about 3 inches wide. Feel free to revert me if you wanted it that way. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

On the Floor

Haha I was just in the middle of adding a commercial performance section LMAO! nevermind. I've added it now. I'm gonna copy edit the article head to toe. I'm so happy. I can't believe its already debuted in Canada... WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Much thanks I love Lopez. I think between us we can make the album and all the singles GA/GA Topics!!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll do a music sample one its released on Feb 15. in meantime I'll copy edit and transpose the article... if its gonna be GA we'll make it amongst the best ones out there!!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

BTW I've nominated it for WP:DYK at this page. I've requested that it is a joint nomination from both of us cause I want you to take some of the credit too for contributing!. Plus its will be your first DYK I believe? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

And likewise with the GA... I know I did most of the leg work but I really think we should share the credit. I wouldn't feel right nominating it alone... since you created it. If I nominated I will only do so as a joint-nomination with yourself! As for Cici... i have no idea what they're doing. I've a sneaking suspicion she's going to be dropped from her label. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Also completely random but have you heard this? Its a frigging awesome song written by Dawn Richard for Ciara (supposed to be like a Promise p.2). its awesome...! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm... I have a sneaking suspicion Jive and Ciara have terminated their dealings by mutual consent. Despite promising to keep promoting the record, why else would "Turn It Up" be removed from radio adds. "Basic Instinct" was like a tub of Spackling paste. It was full of filler but no actually depth or substance. She's been treated absolutely appallingly this era... Interscope or Island/Def Jam would be best place for her now... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)FYI if you didn't know, Dawn Richard is releasing a project this year. I am semi-excited. I will only be fully exited once she has COMPLETELY terminated her contract with Diddy. He's a bastard. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cprice1000. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kylie Minogue.
Message added 02:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Help

Could you keep check on "Whip My Hair" for me? Check the history, I'm afraid it's going to be a battle. Candyo32 12:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks alot! I don't know if people are annoyed that it is a song by a eleven year old that got lots of postive attention or what, but its getting really annoying. Plus, the user is barely active and then decides to show up on Wikipedia and destroy the page. It makes no since to stop including positive reviews in an article because they are "repetitive." Candyo32 15:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Like a Surgeon

Check everysite that talks about Fantasy Ride and it calls "Go Girl" a promo single, and Never Ever the l;ead single. A songs official single ship sisnt determined by if it was released in some way, it is determined by if it was confirmed by the label, and sites call it a buzz single, and never ever the lead single. Why do you think Love Sex Magic is called the second siongle and like a surgeon was planned to be the third. Also, radio1 is unreliable, the source for its release lists radio leaks, not songs that were officially released to radio. If it was released to radio, I would have no problem calling it asingle, but since it wasn't, it shold be know as just a song. The only sites that give official radio release dates in the US are FMQB, AllAccess,and GFK, and none of them listed it, so it was NEVER released. It seems like you think I'm saying "Even though it wass released to radio it was not a single", No im saying, it was never released to radio, so it wasn't a single.--68.79.92.229 (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

There currently isnt a site that has the release dates for US CD singles, besides Amazon.com. Radio1 is wrond and unreliable, as most of the songs it says were released were just radio leaks. EX: It lists Lil Wayne's "Green and Yellow" for this week, when it's only a remix that leaked to the internet.--68.79.92.229 (talk) 04:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure you're watching ANI, but let's go to the talk page for further discussion Worm^TT 15:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar Barnstar
		For giving out appropriate barnstars to other editors (including me). Thank you, and you deserve this. Novice7 | Talk 04:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Nah.. Btw, I saw your work on Can't Get You Out of My Head. Great! Novice7 | Talk 04:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm... Maybe Background and Album art? It needs sourcing, btw. Novice7 | Talk 04:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Go Girl/Neve Ever

MTV confirmed "Never Ever" as official first single and "Go Girl" as a promo single: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1602416/ciara-talks-new-single-with-young-jeezy.jhtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.79.92.229 (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:

Oops, baha. Thanks for letting me know. I'll help out there then. xD ℥^nding·start 23:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cprice1000. You have new messages at Ending-start's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Another message for you on Ending's page. Also I would like you to take "Poison" to GA if you wish too. I've already done a lot of the work for you... all that it needs is a copy edit and a tad more work on the Music video section. It was my dream to give Nicole a GA article and "Poison" is currently the best chance we've got. I hope to be back soon and be able to get her album and "Dont Hold Your Breath" to GA too.... With regards to Love? and "On the Floor" i'll always have a special place in my heart for them. I'm confident for both of them to be of GA quality. Fingers crossed I'll be around to nominate them. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll nominate it if you don't want to and I'll c/e what I find is needed. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

If you wish to nominate it, I will happily side with you as a co-nomination and I will dedicate some time to fixing it. But right now I'm not in a position to nominate it alone due to time. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It didn't work when you added your name. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for On the Floor (song)

Orlady (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Congrats!!!!!!!!! — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Fever

YOU ARE DOING A WONDERFUL JOB. You should use the cover images as references in the cover art section and iTunes or Allmusic to cite the versions. I think the single section should take the form of prose. Do you? Besides these things, it it GREAT. Another GA for WP:Kylie!! YAY!!! I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

YES! This should be a GA for you. You have done a wonderful job. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

"I didn't think of that." Really? Why not make it a GA, hell, FA!!!! It's a wonderful album that probably has LOTS of information to cite. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

And about "Unusual You" hell, you sure proved me wrong... I am surprised, but hell, I offered my opinion. You will murder this article. . I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

LMAO @ the Wow x4. After I finish this discography article (If I don't wrap up the others) I'm gonna start on the song articles. You should do the Aphrodite articles first. Those are the most recent and have the most reserves of info. It gets harder as time goes on. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Amazing work.! You should move the reviews to the Critical reception section using {{Album ratings}} template, per new guidelines. More reviews, maybe (I'll help, lol)? Also, chart performance should be moved up and placed below Critical. I'll remove some Bad certifications. All done! Novice7 | Talk 03:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if you know, but, does the Grammy website allow live stream of the whole show (or even ustream)? Novice7 (talk) 16:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) No no, lol. I can see it on TV. Just curious, that's all. I live in a different time zone, and the show airs on February 14 morning (or I could wait till February 20 for the repeat, lol) Novice7 (talk) 16:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Me, Myself and I

Hi. I need your help. If you see this, someone talked about how Beyonce decided to release "Me, Myself and I" as the third single but i do not know how to write and what to write. Please help me. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

The links contains line line telling that Beyonce needed to show that side of her, etc. Are you able to spot it? It gives a small idea of how she decided to choose it as her third single? Do you get my point? Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so so so much. Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Sale el Sol (song)

Please see Wikipedia:ALBUMCAPS in regards to capitalization of non-English albums and songs articles. In Spanish, only the first letter of the first word is capitalized unless it is a proverb. Magiciandude (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

The above guideline has been revised, so it shall be moved back to its original name. Magiciandude (talk) 04:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

See

Talk:On_the_Floor_(song)#Requested move — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 15:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

HNIN

I strongly disagree with you on this situation. Just because it has a track listing, doesn't mean it needs to be put up right away. Maybe yes it passes, but that doesn't mean that it needs to be in it's own article at the moment. I've been trying to find some sources to expand on it a lot. ℥^nding·start 16:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

That is true. But is that a reason to push it? Not really. It needs some major reconstructing and rewriting. Do you think it's safe to say that "Who's Gonna Love You" and "Happily Never After" have the same writers and producers? ℥^nding·start 16:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I think it's safe to say they have the same writers. Weird, I just tried ASCAP and nothing came up for her. Maybe I just spelled her name wrong. :L But yeah, it still does need some work. And probably from someone who has no experience with any of Nicole's articles should peer review it before becoming an article. ℥^nding·start 16:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

That is true. But I'm still against it. Most likely the only people who will edit it are IPs, and users redirecting it because they think that's how it's supposed to be. Then a edit warring will most likely take place. Of course this couldn't happen, and I'm probably just being over dramatic, but I think a sandbox is fine for the time being. ℥^nding·start 16:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Wow! You're doing some great work! :) Looking good. I'll continue to work on HNIN. ℥^nding·start 16:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

RE: Confused

Brintey tweated a week ago that she WAS NOT performing at the Grammys but had other promotions planned. I'm surprised TV would report otherwise o_O — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

What a bitch. (The TV and other sources). I never saw that! ℥^nding·start 03:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Light Years

Hi CP! (Lol, I shortened your name) I think we should work on Light Years sometime (together). Your work on Fever is beyond amazing, btw. And, did you like the Grammys? I'm so happy for Lady Antebellum, and Miranda Lambert :) – Novice7 (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

It's okay. We can work on Light Years later. – Novice7 (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm... Fever would need some work. I mean, some cleanup. It's in a pretty good shape right now. – Novice7 (talk) 03:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj-Moment 4 Life.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj-Moment 4 Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:PROMOSINGLE

I'm ok with it. Sauloviegas (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Amazing job Cprice. It would need some expansion, in order to answer the "questions" that may arise. – Novice7 (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

"Irresistible"

Lol, actually I started working on the article a lonnggg time ago. This was the version when I started my work. I'm so happy to see that you like my work. Thank you so much!! Trust me, you don't wanna see her videos for I Belong to Me, A Little Bit, and Come on Over. Others are okay, while these three are least amusing. Some of her songs are good though. – Novice7 (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Christina

Am working on it now, sorry if I've caused any stress RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

What is the best way to properly format these references to ensure the article maintains the high standards we want. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Dancing Crazy

I saw the amazing work you've done on getting articles off the ground and was wondering if you could help me out with "Dancing Crazy". I've found some information, but I'm not very good at it. xD It's located on my sandbox. ℥^nding·start 22:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

BTW

Hi. Please, check my talk page for my reply, in my opinion it's a neutral point of view issue. -- Frous (talk) 00:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

RE: STOP

Hello, Cprice1000. You have new messages at Frous's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Promo singles

Quite true. xD But then again... IDK. xD I'm sure a little something something could be found. ℥^nding·start 03:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

LET ME INTRODUCE YA, TO MY PARTY PEOPLE, IN THE CLUB

I can't believe it! I'm so happy for her. Finally some success!! Now Gaga get outta the way. xD ℥^nding·start 03:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

IN DA CLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUB. Just had to do that. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 03:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Born This Way (song)

Hello, I was wandering why you reversed my edit, that was making the article less WP:POVy. I also in the edit said see talk page, and there was no response to the comment on the talk page (under comparison to Madonna section). In my opinion that sentence does not conform with WP:BLP. the article states that

'Gaga herself further addressed the comparisons on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, explaining that she "got an e-mail from [Madonna's] people and her sending me their love and complete support on behalf of the single.” Gaga then proclaimed, “...if the Queen says it shall be, then it shall be.”[32] CNN later reported that Madonna's representative was "not aware that Madonna sent Gaga an e-mail."[33]'

However, the last statement is irrelevant because this is not an article about the relationship between Madonna's representative and Madonna. Gaga claims to get a letter from Madonna, I don't see how her representative being aware of it is relevant. If the representative said "Madonna never sent the letter" or Madonna said "I never sent the letter" of course that should be included. But the above sentence is POVy because it sounds like it is trying to discredit Gaga's remark but does so with no evidence. Also your comment in the revert justification does not say anything about adding back this sentence. Were you trying to revert other edits, and accidentally added this sentence back in? I assume this was a genuine mistake or maybe there is something I am missing here -- MATThematical (talk) 02:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I do see now that the prior sentence says "Madonna's people," however I still think the sentence below should be deleted because people is plural and could mean a lot of things, it does not necessarily mean her representative. I think more concrete evidence is needed to keep the sentence in, or the sentence needs to be clear that it does not necessarily contradict the one that proceeds it. We need to error on the side of caution because this is a BLP. --MATThematical (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Artists have more than one representative. and for all intensive purposes its worth mentioning that someone in Madonna's team disputes Gaga's claim... especially since Madonna's team uploaded Express Yourself to her Vevo/Youtube account again. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

But the whole thing is that the sentence does not say she disputes the claim, it says she/he was unaware of the email, and as you point out there are many representatives, so its very possible that one of the other representatives sent the email. I am not against putting disputing the claim in the article. However, I just don't think the way the sentence is written sounds relevant. If infact Madonna or Madonna's team or even one person on that team disputes the claim, and you have sources stating that then you should definitely put that in the article, but thats not what the current sentence says. It needs to say something like, "one of Madonna's representatives disputes the claim" or "one of Madonna's representatives disputes said no one on Madonna's team ever sent such an email." But I think this should only go in if you think the source supports such a sentence. I need to read the source in more detail, but the current wording doesn't work in my opinion. -- MATThematical (talk) 02:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

AGH! Sorry I didn't see that when I was reverting to Lil-Unique's revision. I think it is worth mentioning in the article and many of those who oppose are serious GaGa freaks and don't give real reasons. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 03:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

..... perhaps it should be better to say... "A representative for Madonna said she wasn't aware of a such an email"? or does that not solve the problem? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair. Second awesome compromise of the day Unique. :P --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 03:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm a bit confused as to how this is a compromise, all you deleted was CNN reporting. I read the source in question, and it includes no explanation as to what was said in this interview, it was a one sentence story. I don't see how one representative being "unaware" about the email contributes to this article in a encyclopedic way. I think when or if Madonna or a representative actually claims that Madonna's camp did not send the email (not just being unaware of the email) then a sentence should be added. Otherwise I fail to see how this sentence keeps with WP standards. Is there a WP:reliable source that talks about this beyond the one sentence quote in the CNN article? I'll let you and others find such a source before I delete the sentence again, because something should be there if we can get a source that says something a little more concrete. --MATThematical (talk) 04:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

sorry if my editing confused you... I had to prune the bush because frankly it was well over-grown. o_O. hehe i do try my best though the guy at The Fame Monster talk page doesn't seem to get it... — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

People don't want their articles simplified because they feel it takes away from the content. Same thing happens when you try to c/e Hung Up. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 03:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I believe the word we're looking for is Zealousy...? ;) — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Born This Way

Hello

Firstly, please do not tell me not to revert your edits. Wikipedia is free and open and it is not for you to tell people what to do and what not to do. I have every right to revert your edits if I choose as long as they conform to Wikipedia standards

Secondly, it is not essential to state what was number one when another single was number 3. Why? Is it essential to note every song that prevented "Born This Way" being number one during it's entire chart performance? The article does not state what was number when "Borh This Way" wasn't number 1 in Italy, France, Norway, Sweden or Denmark so why is the UK an exception? Where is the consistency? It is not relevant or desireable to state minutiae about a singles chart performance, including what was ahead of a song on the charts or what position in held on the mid-week charts. Remember that only official chart position are acceptable on Wikipedia and midweek placings are not official chart peaks and never will be. You might want to have a look at the Wikipedia guidelines for what should and should not be included in music chart related articles and sections WP:CHARTS WP:CHARTTRAJ and WP:INDISCRIMINATE Paul75 (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Please don't tell what I am and what I am not or make assumptions to further your course. I am actual anti-Gaga and disliked the non-NPOV attitude the article was taking. But if you insist on owning this article as "yours" containing "your edits" (which are naturally the only correct ones) against all Wikipedia conventions, you are welcome to it. Paul75 (talk) 10:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

If you made hardly any edits to the article in the first place, and the article is now using the edits I made to the UK chart performance why did you attack me in the first place?! You said the matter is now sorted, so you now agree with what I was doing?! Some consistency would be nice... Paul75 (talk) 12:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heidi Here She Is.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heidi Here She Is.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

"Till the World Ends"

Hey Cprice100, I'm starting the article for "Till the World Ends". However, the song isn't notable enough to have an article (right now), so I'm collecting all the info that I can to edit the article later when the song enter on any chart... If you can help, I would be very grateful! Thanks! :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

That's Where You Take Me

Can you show me any reliable source (Discogs is not reliable) that confirms а release of "That's Where You Take Me"? --demis^talk 20:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Aphrodite

Amen. But, only releasing 3 is better than releasing a half ass effort that can't be 100% promoted because she is on tour. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 00:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Speaking of Better Than Today, I'ma start some GA magic on it. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 00:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Changes in discography

Hi. I added "What's Going On" and "That's Where You Take Me" to main singles table. As you say "That's Where You Take Me" is full single and "What's Going On" is the single to. --demis^talk 09:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Archives

I've been trying to figure it out but I have no idea how. AND OMFG DID YOU HEAR THE NEW WILL PRODUCED BRIT SNIPPET? I FUCKING CANNOT. SOOOO HOT. THE TITLE THO......... ℥^nding·start 02:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Tag the 5th archive and the random 19th for deletion. I think they're interfering. ℥^nding·start 03:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I disagree. It's the fucking shit. I can't stop jamming it. And it's just the intro part anyways. The full song is deff gonna shit. And honestly, Britney didn't sound like her on the whole entire Blackout album. xD ℥^nding·start 12:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

It's such a bitch. It randomly made a 6th archive page without there being a 5th. ℥^nding·start 02:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Shattered Glass

I honestly see no point. It isn't really much of an article as of right now. Maybe with some work, yeah. ℥^nding·start 20:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Lmao what the hell. There was all this shit about it not being notable, and now it's a GA? :L ℥^nding·start 20:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, that's true, but still. o.0 I think there should still be a certain size for an article to be a GA. ℥^nding·start 20:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I get what you mean, but shouldn't an article have enough information for it to warrant the title of a "good article"? ℥^nding·start 20:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Its a little light on content, it needs some minor fleshing out. Adding intricate details to chart performance such as the actual dates it was on the chart. Add writers, producers, mixers and places that recording took place in the Background. Candyo32 22:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I was mostly referring to Hitmixes as being a GA. "Shattered Glass" has a lot more info, but still could be better. I agree with what Candy said above. ℥^nding·start 23:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Good luck with it! I'll help if I can! ℥^nding·start 02:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Shattered Glass

Hi Cprice. Well, it definitely could be soon, but it still needs some of work. I can point out some obvious things just to give you an idea. First of all, I think the lead could be easily expanded to 2 full paragraphs, covering every important aspect of the article. It looks good, but it needs a little more meat. Also, if I was the reviewer, I would ask if there was any more information you could give me on the song. I mean do you have more on the song's background or composition? Her vocal range in the song? Its genre influences? If its in common time? Things like that. Also, it would be beneficial to have some more info such as if the song holds any meaning to Spears or any inside info that can be added to the background section. Lastly, the references need work. #1 needs italics and publishers, #2 as well, #3 as well, #4 needs publisher, #6 needs publisher, #8 needs italics and publisher, #10 as well, #11 needs to come up as Billboard, linked and the publisher. #12 needs 2 publishers, #14 needs proper formatting. Hope this helps :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Nathan covered most issues. Here's what I found. The release date is unsourced. And, the song sample might be of a bit too high quality. Merge the two reception into one single section "Reception" (as there are not much information) Convert all the figure dashes of Credits section to en-dash. And, is the Canadian Hot Digital Singles chart needed? That's all. It could use some expansion, btw. Novice7 (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation on me by new user account?

What even? I don't even know what to say. :L I am in no way a sock puppet. This shit is crazy. It looks like the user who started this case is a sock puppet himself. *rip* ℥^nding·start 23:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I really wanna know who this user is. Seems an IP address reporting me for vandalism. Then an account was made with the IP just with "U" in front of it. I wonder how this user even found this some of this stuff out. I even forgot about some of those accounts existed. xD I REALLY WANT TO KNOW WHO THIS USER IS! It has to be someone I know. ℥^nding·start 23:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

It seems as if it's been resolved. xD Wow, this was weird. ℥^nding·start 00:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Why the Moment 4 Life image keeps getting removed.

I am not the one doing it, but after this last time you put it back. I looked at the file page. You got it from the BBC website. BBC has a known history for putting up fan covers/wrong covers/old covers. You may want to look into the matter. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 01:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll have to co-sign this. One time BBC radio use a fake over for "Crawl", and come to find out, it was a fan-made cover. Candyo32 02:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

My favorite Kylie albums are...

X and Kylie Pixelyoshi (discuter) 12:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know Kylie Minogue-Impossible Princess era Pixelyoshi (discuter) 12:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Dangerously in Love 2 URGENT

Please participate here. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Cprice. I saw on Adabow's talk-page that you said you are bored these days. So would you please help me fix this? I love Beyonce's version.The one she sang on her B'Day tour. Feel free to refuse if you don't want to. I really won't mind. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, never mind. By the way, have you heard the songs "Mr. Saxobeat" and "Seek Bromance"? Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I do not know that you created an article for it. Really a great song. It's addictive. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Really really Off-topic

Hi Cprice! Seems like you're busy these days. Just an off-topic question. Don't get me wrong. If you have heard Whitney Houston, what is your favorite song and album of hers? Novice7 (talk) 12:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe this and this, or if you like softer songs this (Xtina covered this song live!) As for Shattered Glass, it's my pleasure. There are some more fixes, I;ll do them too :) Novice7 (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Glad you liked it :D It is one of her demanding songs (vocally). A few months back, I proposed a Whitney WikiProject, but got no support :( Novice7 (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I don't know why it didn't get support. Maybe I can start a Task force. Oh, I'm Every Woman was recorded by Chaka Khan first. I think I'm finished fixing Shattered Glass. Maybe, you can add a Brit picture to the Reception section? Novice7 (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Added a pic. Check it out. If you feel it does not suit it, feel free to remove it :) Novice7 (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know. WP:GA? has a check for Images ("Illustrated with Images"). If the reviewer says so, we can remove it. It's free, so I don't think an issue would be raised. Novice7 (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

You! Never!! Heard!!! Whitney!!!!! HOW DARE YOU!!!!! I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 01:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

lol Well, in 2009, with her comeback, I was too obsessed with Britney, Cascada, and Lady GaGa to notice anyone else. I was also very picky with my music then. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but not even her comeback which HEAVILY fails in comparison to her work in the 80's and 90's. She was THE BEST. If she would have never met Bobby, She would have still been the queen (not that she isn't XD). I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 02:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Lack of Citations for Your Edits

In your edits today on the article on Mr. Saxobeat you have not provided any citations. Where did you get the information from?

Before your edits, the article had 13 citations of varying quality. Now it has only 11, and 'Citation 7' is showing an error message: "ERROR: Billboard chart was invoked without providing an artist id. Artist id is a mandatory field for this call."

Please can you add citations for your edits, and correct the error you introduced to 'Citation 7'.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)