User talk:Cruinne~enwiki/Archive 1

Cruinne, Seems like you've had this trouble before. Now all I want is my copyrighted material(as declared by your own policies) returned and you can remove the first part about not returning materials. There's probably nothing there I need, but it is the principal of the thing. Second you should not try to whitewash the reviews for your system. I feel I should have my say on Wikipedia also. Whenever you wish to talk about this, let me know. Sorry for messing things up, but I did try to restore things. Glad you have it fixed, but my notes should remain also. Toodles. Don Holt dcholtx at yahoo.com

This isn't the place to discuss it, or for you to express your irritation. Please don't bother the nice WikiFolk; deal with RPoL on RPoL, yeah? Meanwhile, I'm letting the nice people here deal with your disruption in their own way. As I said I'm done. cruinne (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm just documenting that you have stolen intellectual property. I have asked for it's return. You have refused. I will gladly make my case to Wikipedia. As I said before, I will remove the first note about you being unwilling to return property - should you restore it to me. The second addition I made is an opinion - as is your self serving advertisement pretending to be a Wikipedia entry.

Now this really has been a silly dispute. If you want to be all powerful on your site, you have the right to do as you please. If you prefer to have Wikipedia remove your advertisement, that would be to the good. BTW, I'm not irritated at all. As I told you from the start, I wanted off your site, but with my materials. I pointed out some problems I felt you had in your user interface. Sorry, but I realized I hit a nerve. I guess I'm not the first to say something.

Now you won't talk this out. Great.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.253.205 (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

( moved from User:Cruinne)

Well, I just tried asking him nicely. We'll see what happens.

I also edited his changes to a more balanced point of view.

And no, I have no idea how this works either. :p

Your idea of asking nicely and mine seem to be a bit out of agreement. I have honest concerns with and comments on the moderation at RPoL and think those concerns should be addressed in any article concerning that site. I have been subjected to numerous personal insults by Jase, and that should be reflected as well imho in the section about him.

Since the article was not written as neutral to begin with, I think some balanced view can be achieved, but not as written by an RPoL moderator or friend.Karzak 18:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Karzak, please take the time to read Wiki's standards and the like, then move the discussion of neutrality to Talk:Roleplay_Online. It'd be nice if you could also indent your replies via standard wiki markup so we can tell what's going on. As I replied on Ron's page -- you have an axe to grind. You'll need to state your objections clearly and coherently, and not from the POV that you called RPoL's mods names, and insulted them, and ended up banned for it (after requesting we ban you), and now you're upset you got what you asked for. cruinne 18:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

If you want to comment on your treatment of me, and the numerous personal insults directed to me by Jase, or that I asked to be banned (which being banned after asking for it is not my concern with the moderation as you well know) then take your own advice and do it in private.

I comment on the overall quality of moderation at RPoL, and while I am not neutral, my comments are. Moderators at RPoL instigate as much as they moderate, and Jase in particular resorts to insults far beyond anything I did. I think it only fair that the article on RPoL reflect that treatment and point out site flaws, instead of being a simple cheerleader style advertisement for RPoL.Karzak 19:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Fixed indenting -- any other discussion, I trust, will take place in the proper places. cruinne 19:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

---

Hmm... interesting, wandering across this. MAkes me wonder why my userpage was not attacked in this manner....

Anyway, main reason for stopping by was to ask how you get that sidelisting of things like languages spoken?C.B 17:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

I think this went on before you got involved. I'm sure he'd be happy to come by your user page too ;) Anyway, check out Wikipedia Babel (WP:Babel), and Wikipedia UserBoxes (WP:UBX). Cheers :) cruinne 20:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)