User talk:Crychydd

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Crychydd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Awen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(literally “the three elements of inspiration that came, splendid, out of the cauldron” but

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Awen has been reverted.
Your edit here to Awen was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://gorsedd-arberth.blogspot.co.uk/p/maponos-aengus-og-and-awen-inspiration.html/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rigantona[edit]

The redirect was correct and I've restored it. Please don't revert without consensus. This is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Celts#Rigantona. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This a strange use of the word 'correct' as, surely, whether someone feels that a separate entry is needed is a matter of opinion, where 'correct' can only be meaningfully used for matters of fact. How is 'consensus' achieved when arbitrary decisions are taken on the basis of one person's opinion rather than anothers?

Crychydd (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Anglo-Welsh Review[edit]

Fellow Welshman here. Many thanks for this article! One thing though can you please note the categories and ref tidying I did (after punctuation) here and try to replicate it in future articles. Also it is better if your sourcing can be verifiable online, google books is a good place to look, and you can then paste urls into here to get full citations and save you the trouble.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions. Book citations now have live links. Crychydd (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]