User talk:Crystallina/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You did that wrong
I added some more refs to this article and deleted the prod, but I suspect that this will not meet your threshold. If not, please AfD it, so it can go to a review. It was prod'ed a couple of weeks ago, so I added some refs and deleted the prod then. Since those edits you prod'ed it, that probably means that it needs to go to a review. I don't have an interest in this article except that I don't like to see potentially valid articles die for lack of "love", even silly pointless ones (perhaps especially silly pointless ones). So, if this one is truly and validly doomed to die, please take it to the gallows for it to be judged. Thanks. —BozoTheScary 03:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- I like the idea of merging it into the A&F article, but that may be quite a challenge to sell and to execute. Thank you very much. —BozoTheScary 03:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Danny Shea
You nominated an article for deletion at [[1]], and I voted to delete. However, two people have voted to keep, one an IP with no other contributions, and one a single-use account with no other contributions. Is there a way to alert the authorities that something fishy is going on? Yandman 07:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Greetings from fellow LUEser Wikipedians!
Hey, Crystallina! I took your advice and decided to start editing. Thanks! Psycho Kirby 16:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey you :o Psycho Kirby was all "Omg I'm on Crys' discussion page!", so I was all "Omg I wanna be too". I got very jealous, and decided to get on it too. I'm cool now, right? <3 --Zeddie 19:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC) (My name is fixed :D).
- And you already know me :D Will (Glaciers melting in the dead of night) 10:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Mearnhardtfan here, not sure if you know me or not but nice to see fellow people from LUE on Wikipedia. Meanrhardtfan 20:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Crys,
"Interracial" is the old definition (black/white) and doesn't mean "multiracial". However it's a fork of List of Black/White people and should be merged back in. There were several forks like this and I kinda forgot about them until you brought up the AfD. Thanks. ColourBurst 00:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Revert of my user page
Thanks for the revert from the vandalism. --KeithB 03:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Don't bother. It's speedy deletion material.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Categorization
Thanks. I categorized something, took off the tag two minutes later realizing I forgot and you guys are right on top of that noticing I didnt' immediately do that, lol. I'm impressed. --Wizardman 03:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Munich
Hello,
You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!
There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.
How can you help?
- You can join a Task Force.
- You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
- You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
- You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
- You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
- You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
- You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
- You can help reference articles.
- Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
- You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.
A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.
If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.
If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.
Wikipedia:No original research means you can't put your own personal knowledge in. Therefore, it's completely irrelevent on how much you know about Munich. Anyways, everything related to the scope doesn't require addition of info. It can be anything including anything of "how can you help?" above.
Upper Canda College Edit
- 22:29, 24 November 2006 Crystallina (Talk | contribs) (rvv)
- 22:29, 24 November 2006 207.164.21.130 (Talk)
I apologize on the behalf of my peer's so-called "fun". Oh, for the Ed Gein edit, please refer to NinaEliza's discussion, since she did the change. However, I'm curious since I was able to receive the message and I have never searched UCC before, if Wikipedia (or someone, I'm not sure how the banning works) bans the address, does this mean that anyone using the school's network will be able to go onto Wikipedia?
- Blocking applies to edits only; see WP:BLOCK#Effects of being blocked for details. Viewing Wikipedia content will still be allowed. Crystallina 02:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
John Levene
That wasn't a test, actually, but an addition of information. --194.82.45.23 06:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I see what you mean. --194.82.45.23 06:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Article for deletion
Thank you for fixing the format on the deletion of Marcario Garcia. As you can tell, I'm not into deletion of articles even though I've been around Wikipedia for sometime. Cheers!Tony the Marine 06:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Award for Khan Beshov
|
The Khan Beshov Award
Award to Intergr8, for their contribution to Khan Beshov's page. — Intergr8; 14:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC) |
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For all you work reverting vandal edits. Natasha 21:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
You beat me to it! Usually I whack those kinds of articles before someone even has a chance to tag them. Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia from turning into MySpace. --Slowking Man 04:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- 36974 edits?! And you're not an admin? I'm nominating you, and I won't take "no" for an answer. Okay, not really, but would you like to be nominated for adminship? Seems like you'd be a perfect candidate for the mop. --Slowking Man 04:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Sarah Brightman
I removed the line because the exact same text is in the preceding sentence. JCO312 01:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your edit to Mark Arminski
It seems the template you sorted it to does not exist, please update whatever method you're using to change them accordingly: [2].--Crossmr 03:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Amused
Re:This revert - amusing, I'll be moderating that tournament tomorrow :) Raul654 05:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. Have fun with that one. Who knows, maybe the editor was right... Crystallina 05:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Admin
Hey. You ever give any thought to being an admin? After looking at your editor review and through your edit count, I was surpsrised you handt thought of it yet. Just my two cents. --Wizardman 06:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/Crystallina/Archive 2, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
re: HermitStory
Thanks for the comment--how would I go about closing the article nomination so I can open the redirect nomination? Lmblackjack21 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for all the help! :) Lmblackjack21 00:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
It looks like the deletion police are trying to circumvent a previous AFD again. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of media personalities who have vandalised Wikipedia. As you voted keep, could you cast your vote again? - Ta bu shi da yu 22:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Crystallina, apologies, but User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington rolled back my message! I hope you don't mind, but I've rolled back again... - Ta bu shi da yu 11:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The Lion King article
Hey, there.
If it's not too much of a bother, I was wondering if I could get your help on the The Lion King article. I would just like to get your opinion on it, and tell me if you think it's currently ready to be resubmitted for the featured article candidates page.
Thanks, PlatformerMastah 02:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Musicals project
Hi. Anything we can do to get the musicals project active again? Best regards, -- Ssilvers 03:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh hey, I just dropped by and saw this. You might also try to get in touch with User:WesternActor, whom I happen to know to be knowledgeable and interested on the subject. (Also from the ifMUD community. Small world, indeed.) –Unint 22:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I see he's already listed himself on the project page. –Unint 22:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Advice requested
Hi Crystallina. I've been attempting to overview and tidy up the geography cats which involve the places where people live. There appear to be two useful ways of doing it - by region, and by size. Organising by size is difficult because User:Hmains uses the term settlements to cover all sizes of communities, and has altered dictionary definitions [3] to fit his own understanding of the term - [4]. However, community appears to be the term used most often to describe the places where people live, regardless of size. This is the definition of community - [5]. Hmains has reverted much of my work, and insists on settlements being the term we should use - basing it on this decision, which was a declined proposal to rename Settlements by region to Populated places by region. What do you think? Is settlement the appropriate term for covering human communities ranging from well established cities down to refuge camps? Is Human community a viable alternative? Are there other choices? I have started a discussion here and here, with the above wording, but no response as yet. I have left this message on the talk pages of active Geography Project members. And then on this page. I am a bit lost as the best place to discuss this issue. I don't want to delete or rename any category. And I don't want to get into a revert war. I'd like an open debate to reach sensible consensus. I'm now leaving this message on the pages of WikiProject Category members. Can you advise? SilkTork 20:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements)#Settlements SilkTork 11:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Prod
Please notify the creator of the article, that their article is tagged as prod, and what has to be changed in order for the article to remain. --Parker007 02:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- I responded on my talk page :) . --Parker007 02:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
y helo thar
was browsing through the Top 1000 and recognized a name.--Etaonish 14:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Sarah Brightman - free images
Oh boy. My usefulness in terms of this topic ends beyond having access to some periodical archives, I'm afraid. (And from that, I don't think any of the people who paid $750 for a private photo op are going to relinquish their snapshots anytime soon... I hope that isn't an indicator of how common personal photos of her actually are, though.) –Unint 22:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've seen plenty of personal photos but usually they're photos of her and someone else, which aren't the best option. I guess I keep bugging the people at the forums. Crystallina 22:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is, however, a way to solicit your request in the article itself: Wikipedia:Fromowner. Just put Image:Replace this image1.svg in the infobox. Of course, this will orphan the fair-use image you have in there right now. –Unint 23:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Folk?
I notece that you marked "Raisins and Almonds" as a "folk song". Could you please see my comment at Talk:Raisins and Almonds? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 01:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Ultimate X-Men (story arcs): Peer Review
Greetings! In December of 2006, you participated in the discussion for the 2nd deletion nomination of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). After two months of rewriting, reorganizing, and referencing, the article is now undergoing a WikiProject Comics peer review. Your editorial opinion would be most welcome to help us improve the article to A-class status. Thanks for your time! - fmmarianicolon | Talk 06:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thermaltake edit
Hi, I noticed you added a test phrase "abcd , test page" in 2006 (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thermaltake&oldid=41202282) on ThermalTake's page which was never removed. Somehow I can't seem to find the phrase when I try to edit the page... this is odd...
EDIT: It seems someone edited the stub template, fixed that now. Sorry for the confusion, I'm new to this :P --Zephirum 22:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion tags of Macspeech
Well, when I read it, the shortness leaves me thinking spam. I don't think this is a big issue since there are many reasons to speedy the article. Vegaswikian 04:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Matrixism Deletion Review
there is yet another deletion review for the article on Matrixism going on at WP:DRV#Matrixism. Thought you might want to stop by to register your opinion. Thanks. D166ER 03:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Musical Theatre
Hello. As a longstanding member of the Musicals project, would you please weigh in at the discussion at the New Girl in Town article's talk page. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 18:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I don't think anyone is denigrating stub articles: It is great that the editor is starting a lot of articles, and I was initially happily excited when I saw that he had done so. The problem is that the editor deletes information (infoboxes, synopses, character/cast info, references, etc.) from existing articles and consolidates what is left into an unbroken block of text at the top of the article. His intention is to do this to all musical theatre articles, which would be a tragic loss of information to Wikipedia. He also tries to prevent other editors from expanding the articles that he has created or edited (and on Wikipedia, persistence usually succeeds). He disagrees with the guidelines at WP:LEAD and the other manual of style guidelines and states that he rejects the article structure guidelines at the musicals project, since the editors who created the guidelines are no longer active. So I think it is a serious problem. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 16:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
~ G1ggy! Reply | Powderfinger! 04:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The Show
My speling is not good, and my tiping is apppallling. --Amandajm 05:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Ta-da!
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| For beating me to the spelling correction three times today, I award you this barnstar. Use it well! G1ggy! 04:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC) |
- Hey, speaking of which, what tool do you use for spelling checking? Lupin's, or something else? G1ggy! 23:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Yurie Miura
Thank you reading the article of Yurie miura!Women in music should be respected.
All the best!
Hey, the gnome week is a great idea. Hope it's a success and hope you're thinking of doing this atleast once a year.--Vaishu2 09:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Here, have a Barnstar!
|
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
| I award you this Brilliant Idea Barnstar for thinking of a very useful and creative way of trying to fix Wikipedia's many backlogs and article problems. Well done! • The Giant Puffin • 10:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |
Invite template
I made this for your inspired project:
|
You are invited to participate in Gnome Week, a mass article cleanup drive between June 21 and June 28, 2007. |
| This week, backlogs will be cleared. Articles will be polished. Typos will be fixed. Bad prose will be edited. Unreferenced articles will be sourced. No article will be safe from our reach! The more people who participate, the better Wikipedia will become as a result. | |
| I would love it if you would participate! - Fishal |
anon comment
Hi. Thank you for helping clean up Wikipedia articles. Please be careful not to correct the spelling of 18th century spelling in a quoted passage from a source. Thanks.
- Thanks for letting me know - I usually try to check but I must have missed one. Crystallina 17:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
|
|
WikiProject Musical Theatre wants your help! You are listed as either an active or an inactive participant of WikiProject Musical Theatre. This project has been dormant for a while, but we are very close to reaching consensus on several of the project's main documents (see the talk page for details). Once we get that business and formality out of the way, we are all free to attack the musical theatre articles of Wikipedia and have a wonderful Musical Theatre party! We want you to be a part of that!
So, come and join us! Add your input to the last few business items and then let's get this party started!
|
AFD
Travis Tedford is nominated for deletion.Vectorsap 00:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On June 29, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Louise Pitre, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Gnome Week next year
Do you want to setup for next year from Saturday, June 21, 2008 - Saturday, June 28, 2008. I am sorry about only doing 1-2 articles, but I did turn Click'N'Run upside-down. I would like to have another chance next year. Tcrow777 talk 05:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to know what you think about creating: Wikipedia:Gnome Week/next year. Tcrow777 talk 20:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Pedro Marin
I just wanted to say thanks for the clean-up help on Pedro Marin (the Spanish singer), an article I originally wrote. You made the article look much nicer and better organized! Plus you removed the flag about the article "not meeting Wikipedia's quality standards," a flag put there with no further guidance. I am new to writing and editing Wikipedia, so being flagged had puzzled me because the article seemed long enough (how much can you say about any pop star?), and I had cited references and listed sources. So just a big thanks for cleaning it up and putting things right.--Bayonett 11:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for the references and sources also - lots of people don't do this, and it really helps to have them there to begin with. Crystallina 16:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits. People sure do like to use the word "very"! BTW, there is an interesting (to me anyway) discussion going on at the project's talk page about character lists and musical numbers lists in articles. Feel free to join in if you have an opinion on the subject. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 15:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my further question regarding character lists at WP:MUSICALS' talk page. Thanks! -- Ssilvers 01:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Happy Crystallina's Day!
 |
Crystallina has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Love, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
- Happy Day to you Crystallina! :) Acalamari 18:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Silly people at LUE got wind :( Will (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Crystallina, tho we haven't talked much yet, your tireless efforts to improve this place have certainly not gone unnoticed. You deserve this little gift and so much more, and I know I speak for all of us when I tell you, you're an asset to our project and an awesome person. Keep it up, dear Sarah! :) Love, Phaedriel - 23:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Silly people at LUE got wind :( Will (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Richard Bouvri
A tag has been placed on Richard Bouvri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Videmus Omnia 14:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice but I didn't actually create this article. I just moved it. Crystallina 14:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
What do you think?
{{User:Tcrow777/templates/days until gnome week}}
|
|
The next Gnome Week starts in −5,691 days! You are invited! |
What do you think about this new template? Tcrow777 talk 01:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Inhibitor help
Could you wikify this[[6]] page for me?
- Nice try. Crystallina 17:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Your loss. It was more than you could've hoped for.Jay42 19:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Happy End
Wow! Thank you!! I have been meaning to create a Wikipedia entry for the Weill/Brecht musical Happy End for well over a year now, but had never gotten around to doing it. I was actually shocked it didn't have an article when I first looked it up some time ago. Thanks for your work -- I am going to see if there is any info I can add that will expand the article. Danflave 04:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)