User talk:Curaj 4

April 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amity School of Engineering & Technology have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amity School of Engineering & Technology was changed by Curaj 4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974906 on 2022-04-16T10:20:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Stop moving pages

Stop moving pages without consensus. Continuing to do so may result in your account being blocked. CUPIDICAE💕 20:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Yet another, final warning about this. Stop. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Sri Ram Chandra Singh Mahavidyalaya

Hello Curaj 4, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Sri Ram Chandra Singh Mahavidyalaya, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion nominations and notifications

I previously pinged you yesterday, telling you to review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for deletion again. Unfortunately, you have persisted in that behaviour today (Baba Sarvjeet Giri Memorial College and Nandini Nagar Mahavidyalaya). Based on your deleted edits, you appear aware of the proposed deletion process (PROD). However, when proposing deletion or tagging pages for speedy deletion, you need to notify the pages' authors. You have not done any of that.

If you are to continue tagging pages for speedy deletion or "prodding" pages, you need to make sure that the page actually falls under one of the speedy deletion criteria. If not, then use PROD or AfD. Regardless of whatever method you use, you need to notify people on their talk pages.

If you fail to communicate with other editors or follow the speedy deletion criteria, this may result in a block. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I recall asking you just a few days ago to stop moving pages. Undo your moves or this will be taken to ANI. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of F.S. University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on F.S. University, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 21:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 31 hours because of misuse of the criteria for speedy deletion and continued failure to notify users when tagging pages despite being warned days ago in that area. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions again.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sdrqaz (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:PRODs

Hello, Curaj 4,

As you can see in Category:Proposed deletions needing attention, all of the pages that you tagged with Proposed deletion tags were done so incorrectly, without any dates. The tags either have to be fixed by you or the tags need to be removed, rendering the pages unavailable to be PROD'd again. It's best to use Twinkle to tag pages for any kind of deletion to avoid these problems. Twinkle will also post a notification on the talk page of the page creator which is an important step in the deletion process that you failed to do.

If you don't know how to fix your mistakes, I suggest going to the Teahouse and asking for assistance. If the tags aren't fixed over the next two days, I'll untag all of these articles. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Further to Liz's message I see zero evidence that you have done due diligence in assessing notability of the large number of articles that you proposed for deletion, such as searching for coverage. Please stop proposing articles for deletion until you have a better understanding of what constitutes notability for educational establishments and the other articles that you have proposed for deletion. It is disruptive. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Institution of Eminence.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Institution of Eminence.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 11:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Institutes of Eminence. You were warned thrice before by Praxidicae, less than two weeks ago. Please stop moving pages until you learn the relevant policies. Muhandes (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

I just noticed you also went made more controversial moves. You were already temporarily blocked for other violations so there is no point in getting to WP:ANI, but another controversial move without discussion will get you indefinitely blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 12:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jio Institute

The article Jio Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A proposed institute with pending MoU, that started admission today. Not shown to pass WP:NSCHOOL, WP:NORG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Mango Meadows' Parashurama

Hello Curaj 4. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Mango Meadows' Parashurama, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. Thank you. BangJan1999 18:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 72 hours because of continued misuse of the deletion process: reinstating removed PRODs (Special:Diff/1086829034, Special:Diff/1086829094), addition of incorrect CSD nominations (Special:Diff/1086825562, Special:Diff/1086825652), and failure to notify users when tagging pages. You were previously warned on two separate occasions by three administrators in that area. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions again.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sdrqaz (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 11:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Institution of Eminence

A tag has been placed on Category:Institution of Eminence indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

page moves, a final warning

You are fresh off a block for disruptive behavior and not explaining what you're doing in edit summaries and yet you chose to move Statue of Krishna, Greater Noida not ONCE but twice without discussing or explaining it. So let me be a little more clear: stop moving articles entirely and stop making edits without adequately explaining why. If you continue, I will take this to ANI and request an outright block or a pblock from mainspace. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Two-week partial block

You have been blocked from editing (Article) for a period of two weeks for continued misuse of the speedy deletion criteria: Special:Diff/1089793656 and Special:Diff/1089998088. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sdrqaz (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jpsorts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jpsorts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 15:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Airstrips in Uttar Pradesh

A tag has been placed on Category:Airstrips in Uttar Pradesh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

F.S. University moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, F.S. University, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:F.S. University

Hello, Curaj 4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:F.S. University, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:F.S. University

Hello, Curaj 4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "F.S. University".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)