User talk:Cvcc

Your edits to Japan

Please do not add sub-sections to the article. It is frowned upon by the people who determine what good articles are - if you keep putting them in the page might lose its FA status. Furthermore you are adding a lot of unsourced material. If you want to add information you must cite every bit of it - we can't tell where you got it from.

Please use the talk page to discuss further changes. John Smith's (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Re:You impersonated me

Wikipedia is not a place for battle ground. You've seen that I equally gave warnings to both parties, but you really act like a twin of Koreakorea1. You or Koreakorea1 inserted wrong statics or blanked information unrelated to statics. Why? I don't think the new advent of open proxy users are coincidence. You or your friend extend edit warring not only in English wikipedia but also 12 other language places.

And why did you intentionally copy and paste my comment to others? --Appletrees (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

1, There is not wrong statistics and blanked info in the article of south korea. If there are, please tell me.
2., Simply I felt it was suitable sentences to warn. Why are you so heating up?
3, Probably you are saying about the article of South Korea. I saw the article of South Korea in other major languages(Deutsch, Español, Français, Nederlands, Português , Suomi and 中文), but I can not find out the edit war in these languages. Please tell me which 12 languages, I'll check them. There is many languages having the article of South Korea.--Cvcc (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You copied and pasted my initial comment here, so I reply your answer to here with the first one.

1. As I repeatedly said to Koreakorea1 and you at talk of South Korea article, you blanked and altered information about rankings and technology. Do you want to see what have you done? Just see Special:Contributions/Cvcc and Special:Contributions/Koreakorea1 and the talk page and my WP:AN3 report.

2. Several open proxy users emerged after your engagement in the article and copied my edit summaries and act like me. Your excuse is not enough for your copying me.

3. You edited several articles related to Korea beside South Korea article. You made an edit war on images. The article is not a image repository and you may well know that why several Korean editors objected to the blatant intention of including the photos on the parallel line. And I saw the 2channel, so should I thank you for your participation? --Appletrees (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)