User talk:Cwhit3134

Hello, Cwhit3134! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons \ Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

About editing on behalf of a company you work for

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Delaware North Companies

I saw your recent additions on the talk page. At first glance the content seems fine however in order for this article to stand for any length of time it requires independent third party sources to support the statements made. Other then a Forbes article I see that the annual report is sourced. Any facts that are not supported by sources should be deleted. This page provides some good information: WP:PROVEIT. Do you have any other independent sources? Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 17:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

The new sources help. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 14:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chef Roland Henin 2007.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chef Roland Henin 2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Help

{{helpme}} I am interested in posting a box, similar to the one that Aramark has on its Wikipedia page, on Delaware North Companies Wiki page....how do I do this?

If you are talking about the box in the upper right corner of Aramark, that is called an infobox, which is a table to present summary information. The article on Aramark is using a company infobox, from Template:Infobox Company. That page has information on how to create an infobox for a company with examples.

If you are talking about a different box, please let me know and I will try to answer any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 14:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

{{helpme}} What are the policies for posting criticism on living person biographies? For example, is it appropriate to criticize a sports owner for what some people deem being cheap/greedy on their living biography page. Or is that topic, whether it's well-sourced or not, better suited for the team page, if anywhere.

Any criticism or otherwise potentially defamatory information about a living person must be impeccably referenced to absolutely reliable sources. Your best bet is to bring it up on the talkpage of the article (include the sources!) and work it out there. //roux   18:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit conflict - I was about to type something very similar. Have a read of WP:BLP for more on this. If the references support the facts, and the facts are solid, and it's relevent to the article then it needs to go in. However, if it's 'some people think this, others think that' then you need to make that clear in the phrasing. Also, avoid giving undue weight to an issue. Hope this helps, if you need more ideas ask on my own talk page. --  Chzz  ►  19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chef Roland Henin Headshot.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chef Roland Henin Headshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jacobs photo.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jacobs photo.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Buildings downtown 005.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Buildings downtown 005.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 04:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Media.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Media.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 11:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Media.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Media.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)