User talk:Cyber Warrior

September 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cyber Warrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess I have multiple accounts and never use them. In other ways i use my accounts to find articals only. $$$ 12:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is not the case that you don't use your multiple accounts. This and one other sockpuppet account have both edited Imaduddin School, for example. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cyber Warrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16611 was submitted on Sep 27, 2016 13:33:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

How long is a block.

The block is indefinite. That means you have to convince us to lift it, it won't expire automatically. It may be lifted at any time once you have convinced us to lift it. --Yamla (talk) 12:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cyber Warrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess I understand the reason why I am been blocked for , I have dicided I will not make the same mistake as i did before and continue contributing to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Considering your history of dishonesty, edit-warring, copyright infringements, lack of competence, and so on, I think you will need to actually explain what you think you have done wrong, and how your future editing will be different, rather than just telling us that you understand and expecting us to take your word for it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you understood why you were blocked, then why are you continuing to use your sockpuppet on another wiki to complain about your attempts to edit this one? Also, your message there indicates that you still haven't understood our copyright policy (or even the very nature of copyrights).

I would advise any admin seriously considering an unblock to examine my discussion with Cyber Warrior on my talk page, as well as the warnings and discussions he removed from this page. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut I don't like when theres too much on talk page thats why I removed them. After I read the 'Removal of comments, notices, and warnings' artical and I dicided to not remove any contant otherwise I cloud have removed everything on this page , In other word I was not aware of Removal of comments, notices, and warning was prohibited.

I already undustood wikipedia Copyrights I read the artical when you gave me the warning and I know you can't add anything to wikipedia unless its under fair use of (CC BY-SA 3.0) so i have I removed any copyrights contant which I have added.

I was using another account when you removed my added contant so i used that account to renew it back And compain

Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cyber Warrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess My history of dishonesty, edit-warring, copyright infringements, lack of competence, Is the reason why I am Blocked. I belive I had already removed anything copyrights before I got blocked I promise i will try my best and compete my dishonesty and become honest. I have used multiple accounts for and complain about other users. I guess I have given a brife thing about what I did I hope the person reviewing this undustands and unblock me If i get unblocked I will continue contributing wikipedia and stop using copyright contant. I hope I have given a good reason to unblock me. 9:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were using WP:sockpuppets as soon as today. We can't trust you. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Floquenbeam:Help Unblock

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cyber Warrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16632 was submitted on Oct 01, 2016 08:59:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steven Williams[edit]

Hello, Cyber Warrior. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steven Williams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]