User talk:CycloneYoris/Archive 50

Archive 45

←

Archive 48

Archive 49

Archive 50

Archive 51

Move reverted

I have reverted your page move to Omar Faruk by giving a valid edit summary. Let me know if you have any further queries. Maliner (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

@Maliner: Not at all. Thanks for moving it back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

• From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!

• Special report: Public Domain Day 2024

• Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit

• News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate

• In the media: What is plagiarism? Oklahoma Disneyland? Reaching a human being at Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine

• Obituary: Anthony Bradbury

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023

• Crossword: everybody gangsta till the style sheets start cascading

• Comix: Conflict resolution

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2024)

Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is: Shovel Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Antacid • Fish slice Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

why disedit my correct information

hi, i noticed you undid my revision on economy of bangladesh about foreign reserves when it indeed is at $20 billion as i provided reliable sources. Why have you removed it even if i wrote something correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:ED15:3C33:F362:C7F7 (talk) 01:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

You did not provide any source for your changes and that is why it was reverted. Please read WP:RS. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I ate your cookies :)

ClumsyOwlet has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

ClumsyOwlet (talk) 04:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2024)

Visualization of one newton of force Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is: Newton (unit) Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Shovel • Antacid Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: Thank you! :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2024)

Mahatma Gandhi with a young Indira Ghandi, during his fast in 1924 Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is: Hunger strike Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Newton (unit) • Shovel Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Issue with user who keeps reverting my research-based edits

Hi there! I have an editor Potatín5 (who looks to have almost been banned from the platform a year ago according to his talk page) systematically going back and reverting my research-based edits. What can I do about this? IncandescentBliss (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

@IncandescentBliss: You can go ahead and report them for edit warring at WP:ANI and an administrator will surely respond and take appropriate action. I can see they've already accumulated several warnings at their talk page, so I'm positive that an admin will know what to do with them. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

How do I connect with the people spearheading Wikiproject Bible?

I reached out in the talk page and haven’t heard back. It doesn’t seem like too many editors are active in editing them. Is there someone(s) who I could reach out to in a talk page directly who spearheads the project? IncandescentBliss (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm not familiar at all with that WikiProject. Maybe if you're patient enough, someone at the talk page will respond. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

• News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail

• Opinion: Until it happens to you

• Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry

• In the media: Katherine Maher new NPR CEO, go check Wikipedia, race in the race

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate, part 2

• Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"

• Comix: We've all got to start somewhere

• Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome CycloneYoris! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:44, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Wilmer Valderrama

Hi! I’m new here. I’m just asking about the change you reverted on the Valderrama page. I think with the previous parts of his personal life it is relevant to say the age of the women he was dating, as they were teenagers. But I also think there should be consistency in the reporting of their ages, and I think it’s misleading to not put their ages for the last one. Thanks! Huskago (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

@Huskago: Hi! I reverted your edits because they seemed redundant. It is already stated there on the Valderrama article that he became engaged to Amanda Pacheco who is eleven years his junior. So, in my opinion, there's no need to add anything else. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! Huskago (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)