User talk:D7oom021

Y doom ayrak 3al edits #كلن يعني كلن — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.23.105.249 (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, D7oom021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 17:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop closing the date of the Iraq conflict (2003–present) without providing any sources. There is currently an ongoing discussion at Talk:Iraqi Civil War (2014–present) regarding the date of the current phase of the conflict, and at the moment consensus is the phase, and thus the overall conflict, is still ongoing. Feel free to join in on the discussion, but per Wikipedia's policy, no changes are to be made until the discussion is ongoing or a decision is made. EkoGraf (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eko[edit]

May I ask you where are you from ekograf D7oom021 (talk) 17:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia. EkoGraf (talk) 01:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a boy or a girl D7oom021 (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pp-dispute on 2017–18 Iranian protests[edit]

Please do not remove {{pp-dispute}} until protection expires on 7 January. It's there to notify viewers of the article that it is semi-protected. Thank you. —MRD2014 ^Talk 18:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eko[edit]

Ah it’s a shame! I really wanted to meet you. I like a person who’s always accurate about information. D7oom021 (talk) 11:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Syria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aṭlas (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of totalitarian regimes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. See WP:VERIFY. You'd need multiple reliable sources calling these big tent states. Doug Weller talk 17:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen[edit]

The article Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chetsford (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heliotom (talk) 05:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Heliotom. Your recent edit to the page First Lady appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is no such thing as First Lady of Saudi Arabia. Please provide sources before making these additions Heliotom (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to First Lady. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Heliotom (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC) Heliotom (talk) What is wrong with you? Are you mentally ill. Do you wanna pick up a fight. Who do you think you are to threaten to block me from editing? First of all, us SAUDIS call the princess the First Lady; Its an unofficial title; So I don’t have sources. Do you mean it’s ok for Melania but prohibited for her highness. If I even see a message from you addressed to me about this subject, Or any change in the page from you, I will BLOCK you, you hear me.[reply]

Hello, I'm Heliotom. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Fahda bint Falah Al Hathleen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Heliotom (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, and I don’t have a source because the title is gonna be official on April 1st. You can look if you want

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Z0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lebanese people (Protestant Christians), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The editor whose username is Z0 18:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lebanese people (Greek Orthodox Christians), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create duplicate articles, like you did at Iraqi conflict (2003–2017). We only need one copy of each article. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lebanese people (Greek Orthodox Christians), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Pincrete (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lebanese people (Greek Orthodox Christians), you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saudi Arabia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 19:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT call other editors vandals because of a content dispute[edit]

See WP:VANDALISM and assume good faith. Doug Weller talk 06:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Despite warnings and a block, you're still adding unsourced information[edit]

I see that User:OhNoitsJamie blocked you before. If you continue you will probably be blocked for a longer period of time. Doug Weller talk 07:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of totalitarian regimes[edit]

you've been warned multiple times by multiple people (including multiple admins) not to add badly sourced information, and to engage in the open talk page discussions. You have ignored the warnings, ignored the talk page discussions. Now you are edit warring. -- GreenC 20:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You keep adding unsourced content in a slow edit war. I've started discussions on the talk page, which you ignore. I've posted on your talk page here, which you ignore. And you keep doing it. Notifying @Doug Weller and Ohnoitsjamie: and anyone else following this case. -- GreenC 15:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 2 weeks; upon expiration of your block, I suggest you discuss controversial edits on article talk pages[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, D7oom021. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, D7oom021. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, D7oom021, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Saudi Arabia, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Third block (three months[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello D7oom021. I noticed that you are temporary blocked, but would still like to make sure that you received this standard notice in relation to conflict of interest, because of this message where you said that you worked for the government.

Hello, D7oom021. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 18:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Turkey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 06:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Religion in Turkey. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization ^Talk 06:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Druze. You are again edit warring, inserting poorly verified content, removing content without explanation. You've been blocked before for various kinds of disruption, and User:Ohnoitsjamie warned you a long time ago to discuss controversial changes. Turning the Druze into Muslims is such a controversial change. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese government of January 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanese government of January 2020[edit]

Hello, you removed the political affiliation of the ministers from Lebanese government of January 2020. This is important information and unless you can justify this decision I will add it back.equitor (talk) 05:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]