User talk:DJ Autagirl

July 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Wikipedia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wikipedia was changed by DJ Autagirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876179 on 2013-07-30T07:18:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 07:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 07:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bull Terrier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bull Terrier was changed by DJ Autagirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86909 on 2014-09-18T02:15:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DJ Autagirl/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! DJ Autagirl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Nuce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AFD[edit]

Hi DJ Autagirl, Before nominating articles editors are expected to follow WP:BEFORE and look for sources ... which judging by these AFDs [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] you clearly haven't done so so I've closed them all as Speedy Keep,
In future please read WP:AFD and follow WP:BEFORE before renominating any articles,
Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also you should read this as AFD isn't for clean up solutions either. –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:AFDHOWTO. It comes across as devious that you chose to leave no edit summary at all when nominating these pages for deletion, rather than the recommended "AfD: Nominated for deletion...".

Please explain how no edit summary implies deviousness. DJ Autagirl (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If other users have added a file to their watchlist, they are entitled to expect major proposals – such as nomination for deletion – to be described explicitly in the edit summary. That is why the HOWTO page recommends this practice. – Fayenatic London 13:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In these cases, it would have been better to propose merger/redirect to a list of characters, not outright deletion. See {{mergeto}}.
Moreover, in several cases you remvoved the DISPLAYTITLE template for no apparent reason. Perhaps you wanted to re-use the braces? An easy way to insert a fresh set is by clicking on {{}} in the Wiki markup panel below the edit window. If you don't see this panel, click on the "Insert" pop-up menu bar and change it to Wiki markup. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic London 13:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of programs broadcast by Hungama TV. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 11:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of programs broadcast by Hungama TV. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 14:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Jack Gordon, you may be blocked from editing. Eteethan (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Low-rise (fashion), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Stop mass AfDing things with the same reason. You've been warned about disruptive behaviour before. Take a minute and carefully look at the article you're about to nominate, check for sources, and then proceed to create a nomination for deletion based off of the article. Don't nominate as "fancruft" with "no real world coverage" and then not explain the relevance of those to the article. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 07:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your final warning. Stop creating AfDs for characters without first checking to see if a merge is within the realm of possibility. There's no way that you couldn't have known that this is the proper way to do things, after you received a warning from Davey2010 over this very topic. If you had researched the characters or pages, you would have seen that the list of characters page for the Series of Unfortunate Events series has a long history of successful merge proposals. Given that you were given this warning via your talk page and several people pointed this out at the AfDs for the Matrix characters, there's no way that you wouldn't be aware that you have to do proper WP:BEFORE.

I would like to request that you not AfD any other character pages for the time being and that you instead work on learning policy a bit more. You've made less than 300 edits and so far you aren't really showing that you really understand policy or that you're listening to what people are saying to you. If you make another round of nominations like this one, you run a very strong risk of getting blocked from editing as a disruptive editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initially I was just going to warn you, but a look shows that you've opened a whopping 26 pages for characters without doing WP:BEFORE. Some of these were done prior to the warning by Davey, but most of them were not. This made me think that you likely wouldn't pay any attention to my final warning and you've already been given more than enough notice to know that you should look into merging first. This is only a short block, but I do need to make sure that you understand that you need to follow policy. Before nominating any further character pages for AfD, first make sure that merging isn't an option. It's rare that a character in an extremely notable, long running series of any type (film, book, TV, etc) will not merit a list page for characters. In these AfDs merging is almost always the end result, so it saves more time and energy to open up a merge request. Only if there's actual pushback should you open an AfD. Claiming that you believe that there will be opposition is not a truly valid reason unless you can show some sort of proof that this would be the case, which I don't see that you've ever actually done. Once the 48 hours block is up you can resume editing, but I would strongly recommend that you not nominate any further characters for AfD for the time being. Use merge discussions first, especially since I don't really see that you have a firm grasp of policy as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I 100% support Tokyogirl79s block - You've had the best part of 3 months to read and understand the whole AFD and Merge process....- If you don't understand it then you ask someone .... You don't ignore the warnings and advice and just carry on regardless!,

It obviously goes without saying If you repeat the above after your 48hr block then you'll probably be blocked indefinitely without hesitation so unless you wanna be blocked I strongly suggest you do a bit of reading.... –Davey2010^Talk 15:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mondo TV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kath Soucie. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not considered a reliable source, particularly for WP:BLP articles and even more so for personal data. I'm not issuing you another warning because at least you provided an edit summary, but don't re-add the DOB into the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation warning - Fangusu[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fangusu. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fangusu (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:DJ Autagirl/sandbox[edit]

Hello, DJ Autagirl. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, DJ Autagirl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this request seriously[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Autagirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do any of you users remember Gaz Membrane from Invader Zim? Many episodes of that show tell us, the audience, that while Gaz does know about Zim's identity and goals, she never tries to stop him because she does NOT care at all about his many attempts to conquer Earth. When I request to be forgiven and unblocked, what I want is for you users to please TRY to adopt the same attitude towards my behavior on Wikipedia that Gaz Membrane adopts towards Zim's behavior on Earth. Why can't any of you users ever consider doing that favor for me? Why?? DJ Autagirl (talk) 04:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see any reason why Invader Zim is in any way related to your block for sock puppetry. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Autagirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Put it this way: In Invader Zim, the antagonist, Dib, sometimes tries to get his sister, Gaz, to assist him in stopping the protagonist, Zim, from conquering the Earth. Whenever this happens, Gaz states that while she is aware of Zim's identity and goals, she does NOT care at all about his activities. What I am trying to say is this: Just as Gaz Membrane chooses to NOT care at all about Zim's activities on Earth, similarly, I really wish that you users would choose to NOT care at all about my activities on Wikipedia, no matter how questionable they may seem. This is what I mean by apathy and indifference. DJ Autagirl (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. We do care about Wikipedia, which in turn makes us care about others' questionable conduct on Wikipedia. Try Uncyclopedia if you want a wiki where people don't care about others' activities. Huon (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2017[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of In Nuce[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on In Nuce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Nuce (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]