User talk:DLCY89*

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi DLCY89*! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Adflatusstalk 05:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you im glad to be here:) DLCY89* (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm UtherSRG. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, El Dorado County, California, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. UtherSRG (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the reliable source is on the board of supervisors DLCY89* (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Next time, when updating info, indicate in the edit summary that the existing ref includes the updated info, such as "per existing ref". Is this also the case for all of the other county updates you made? - UtherSRG (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to tag the page you created for WP:G7 speedy deletion? I noticed that you've blanked it. Prodraxis (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes DLCY89* (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, can you please tag it with the {{db-g7}} template on source editing mode? Prodraxis (talk) 05:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes i will DLCY89* (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection[edit]

Since blocking each of your sockpuppet accounts when it comes up isn't enough, unfortunately various pages you have targetted will be protected for a while. It will, of course, be possible to increase both the level of protection and the protection duration,but doing so will run the risk of causing inconvenience for some legitimate editors a well as you, so I hope you won't choose to make that necessary. JBW (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DLCY89* (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been block by User:JBW for enforcing MOS:COLOR and MOS:ICONS the Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) JBW has remove my reply on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) User:JBW revertrd pages that Violates MOS:ICONS and fails MOS:COLOR and has vandlised pages such as V. Manuel Perez, Chuck Washington (politician) I have also went back on the history and have seen block peaple that have also enforce removing Violates MOS:ICONS and fails MOS:COLOR on election pages I would like to resolved the color bars issue and we are coming close to a solution so if I can please be unblocked to finish the work DLCY89* (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. Your appeal completely fails to address the actual reason for your block in this appeal. The socking is  Confirmed, by the way.-- Ponyobons mots 21:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.