User talk:DROSE78

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DROSE78, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi DROSE78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


November 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAMERAwMUSTACHE. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, DaBaby, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2003 Illinois vs. Penn State football game[edit]

Hello DROSE78,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2003 Illinois vs. Penn State football game for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 21:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notices[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angry white man, you may be blocked from editing. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 07:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You should only be unblocked if you agree to topic bans from American politics and from issues dealing with race. Doug Weller talk 07:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]