User talk:Daballack

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dunedin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-gadfium 22:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Gadfium, you will be blocked from editing. -gadfium 22:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Micheal fa alonga

A tag has been placed on Micheal fa alonga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bhockey10 (talk) 06:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cricket. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bhockey10 (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Ballack, you will be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Great power, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. -- Phoenix (talk) 08:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Largest cities of India, you will be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bangalore Skyline.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bangalore Skyline.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mumbai at Night.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mumbai at Night.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kolkata at night.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kolkata at night.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Hyderabad skyline 2010.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Hyderabad skyline 2010.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from Various places on the internet. As a copyright violation, File:Hyderabad skyline 2010.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Hyderabad skyline 2010.jpg]].
Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
- Peripitus (Talk) 06:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hyderabad Icon.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hyderabad Icon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mumbai at Night.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Mumbai at Night.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bangalore City.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Bangalore City.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 07:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Template:Largest cities of India‎ has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 07:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kolkata at night.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Kolkata at night.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mumbai at night2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Mumbai at night2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Largest cities of India‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Abecedare (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Perhaps you are not reading the posted notes on copyright ? Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and taking images off websites, uploading them here, claiming them as yours, ignoring repeated messages that it's the wrong thing....basically leads to your editing and uploading rights being blocked to prevent damage to the site. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Peripitus (Talk) 06:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have just uploaded File:Sky2ot0.jpg which you claim is self-made but is a direct copy of this [img185.imageshack.us/img185/9312/sky2ot0.jpg image from www.skyscrapercity.com]. I have deleted this and the other image you uploaded and re blocked your account. If you can convince an administrator that you have understood copyright you may be unblocked. Note that I have not set an expiry date on this block and you will remain blocked until you can show why you should not be - Peripitus (Talk) 07:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]