User talk:DamiaanVDW

Welcome!

Hello, DamiaanVDW, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Damiaan Van Der Werf, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JCutter (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Damiaan Van Der Werf[edit]

A tag has been placed on Damiaan Van Der Werf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Axel.[edit]

A tag has been placed on Axel. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 02:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JCutter (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To make this completely clear: It is not enough that your project merely exists: it must demonstrate that it is notable. Please see Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G Brown[edit]

Hi - The information was imo unrelated to the life story of G Brown - and seemed spamish to me (large reams of cut and copy paste text) - of the link wikileaks.org - not a WP:RS - perhaps on the article about Gordon Brown Gov - you could try asking on the talkpage there - Premiership_of_Gordon_Brown - if I was you I would just ask and provide a WP:RS and newspaper or online source rather than wikileaks - and aviod the ciut and copy paste - personally imo you are wasting your time and its not notable for inclusion but you will perhaps get a second opion there. - regards - Youreallycan 23:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]