User talk:Danarothrock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Danarothrock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the International Forum on Globalization article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also don't remove the copyright violation notice. If you read it, you'll see you can create a temporary page and continue editing a version of the article. Happy editing!--Fuhghettaboutit 21:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you THIS Dana Rothrock?[edit]

Are you the Dana Rothrock who doesn't believe in photons? That is to say, doesn't believe that EM waves are also particles? If you are, I'd appreciate it if you'd send me a quick e-mail at this address: sandy<at>nwimail<dot>com

I'm just curious what your background is and if you have a blog, website, or anything else I can read. I also have doubts about photons. SDLarsen (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Tests of general relativity appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 talk 11:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]