Jump to content

User talk:Daniel/Archive/99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.
Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page.
← Archive 98 · Archive 99 · Archive 100 →

New York Methodist Hospital[edit]

Hello Daniel--I checked out the Help section and read that the best way to talk to someone about company page updates is to reach out to an editor familiar with page. As you were one of the admins to block our hobbyist harasser, I thought I ask you. Please forgive any missteps. I work in the public affairs office of the New York Methodist Hospital, and NYM will be going through a major rebranding soon, and due to conflict of interest issues, I know that I cannot do the updating myself (right?). However, I want to make sure that that editors (non-affiliated) are notified so that our page is at least up to date. I also want to mention that our page has been a point of contention for a certain individual (currently banned). Can someone please advise the best way to go about this? thanks 143.104.225.142 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)143.104.225.142[reply]

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins[edit]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Userm[edit]

Template:Userm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers[edit]

Hi Daniel/Archive.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best. .

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Daniel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 December 2016[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday![edit]

Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 04:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edward przydzial User page Protect by user request 15:04, 19 June 2008 ?!![edit]

why did you Protect Edward przydzial User page by user request 15:04, 19 June 2008‎ as edit autoconfirmed move autoconfirmed Waptek (talk) 23:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anuradha Bhattacharyya[edit]

Dear Daniel, 2 years ago I had created a page by the name Anuradha Bhattacharyya, citing her as an Indian author. Recently, she has been awarded the Chandigarh Sahitya Akademi Award for best Book in English in 2016. The book is a novel titled One Word which was published in 2016 by Creative Crows: new Delhi. I think you can now publish her page as she has become 'notable'. Bhattacharyya is erroneously spelled with a single 'y' sometimes. I am showing you links to 3 places.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/education/sahitya-akademi-honour-for-writers/384418.html

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/7/10416/An-Author-and-a-Poet-Speaks

https://kitaab.org/tag/anuradha-bhattacharyya/

I think these links are citations that prove her notability.

Thank you, AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For context see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuradha Bhattacharyya. - Bri (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Many[edit]

Care To Restore That Page About Me... I Think I'm Notable Now This Article In Inc. (magazine) Explains http://www.inc.com/john-boitnott/how-to-use-your-talent-to-attract-the-attention-of-major-brands.htmlAlong With This Article In The American City Business Journals http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2016/03/14/dj-many-twitter-personality-emanuel-thomas.html Or You Could Always Just Google Me. Also I Now Have A Huge Cult Following Now With Over A Million Followers On Twitter http://Twitter.com/DJMany I Also Have A New Music Video On VEVO http://www.vevo.com/artist/dj-many With This Guy Donny Osmond Which Currently Has Over A Million Views Which Once Again Verifies My Cult Following. Wich Meets This Articles Guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers I Previously Failed This Because I Was Not Notable Back When My Page Was Deleted. I Would Think I Have Passed The Threshold Now. DJ Many56 (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Daniel, this editor has posted similar requests at my talk page and at Peridon's. In view of the fact that his editing has been contrary to the understanding on which he was unblocked, that he would not continue to attempt to use Wikipedia for self-promotion, and in view of this blatant admin shopping, I have blocked the account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diffneeded[edit]

Template:Diffneeded has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 June 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 June 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 July 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 September 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:A-LeaguePreSeasonCup2006Finals[edit]

Template:A-LeaguePreSeasonCup2006Finals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Daniel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: User talk:Daniel/Archive/54[edit]

User talk:Daniel/Archive/54 is generating high priority lint errors.

The following four requested changes will not affect page display, and will fix 3 high-priority and 1 medium-priority lint errors.

1. Remove the line break just before

{{Nowrap end}}</center>

This will remove one high-priority Paragraph wrapping bug workaround, one low-priority Stripped tags, and one low-priority Missing end tag. At this time, this is the one and only Paragraph wrapping bug workaround known in all of English Wikipedia, so it would be great to fix it.

2. Just above the line

{| style="background-color: transparent; border: none;"

insert a new line

|}

This will remove one high-priority Table tag that should be deleted.

3. Change the section

;Recent events<span style="font-size: 9pt;">
{{*mp}} [[December 2|Dec 2]]: The project was the first WikiProject to receive the [[User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle#Special edition WikiProject triple crowns|WikiProject Triple Crown]] from [[User:Durova|Durova]].
{{*mp}} Nov [[November 26|26]] & [[November 28|28]]: [[WP:AFD|AfD]] debates opened for articles pertaining to the future [[Australian federal election, 2010|2010 election]] and the term "[[Prime Minister-elect]]".
{{*mp}} [[November 26|Nov 26]]: Seven Australia-related articles were promoted to [[WP:FA|featured article]] status, making November 2007 WikiProject Australia's "FA Month".
</span>

to:

;Recent events
* <span style="font-size: 9pt;"> [[December 2|Dec 2]]: The project was the first WikiProject to receive the [[User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle#Special edition WikiProject triple crowns|WikiProject Triple Crown]] from [[User:Durova|Durova]].</span>
* <span style="font-size: 9pt;"> Nov [[November 26|26]] & [[November 28|28]]: [[WP:AFD|AfD]] debates opened for articles pertaining to the future [[Australian federal election, 2010|2010 election]] and the term "[[Prime Minister-elect]]".</span>
* <span style="font-size: 9pt;"> [[November 26|Nov 26]]: Seven Australia-related articles were promoted to [[WP:FA|featured article]] status, making November 2007 WikiProject Australia's "FA Month".</span>

This will remove one high-priority Misnested tag with different rendering in HTML5 and HTML4 and one low-priority Stripped tags.

4. In the section

<s>Hi,
I'm curious as to why you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Banu_Qurayza&diff=176868222&oldid=176820517 this edit]. I checked, [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Banu Qurayza|the mediation talk page]], [[Talk:Banu Qurayza|the article talk page]], [[User talk:Daniel|your talk page]], [[User talk:Str1977|Str1977's talk page]] and [[User talk:Shell Kinney|Shell Kinney's talk page]], but found no evidence that Str1977 made this comment.
Is there any other venue of communication that I'm unaware of?[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 02:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)</s>
  • change the initial <s> to <div style="text-decoration: line-through;">
  • change the final </s> to </div>

This will remove one medium-priority Misnested tags.

After these four changes, there will still be lint errors, but they will all be low priority.

Respectfully submitted, —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: any chance you could copy the entire page to your userspace, fix it, and then link to it here? I will probably make a mistake while following the instructions above. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
MSGJ:  Done, at User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. That document displays with some red error messages at the top emanating from the user's header template {{User talk:Daniel/Archive/Header}}, which doesn't expect to be located in articles with the word "Lint" in their names. After the document is copied into User talk:Daniel/Archive/54, these red error messages won't appear in the target document.
This is "guaranteed to work", but obviously I can't do the final test of actually doing it, so let me know after you do the copy (or if you have to revert for any reason). —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)|}[reply]
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel/Archive/99&oldid=883183335"