User talk:Daniel Newman

License tagging for Image:Queen Anne Boleyn 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Queen Anne Boleyn 2.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:K81mc1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:K81mc1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Carpenters42.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Carpenters42.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 21:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:G53fmc1_.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:G53fmc1_.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fitzwilliam Virginal Book[edit]

First of all thank you for your wonderful work in listing the contents of the FVB! You may see that I have removed several attributions of Byrd to My Ladye Nevells Booke - not sure why you included these as in the same, but they definitely aren't! Hope you agree...

Thanks again, and best wishes

Nick Michael 21:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Palace - Oatlands.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Palace - Oatlands.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image is in the public domain, painted in the 17th century. Danny 20:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Palace_-_Oatlands_2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Palace_-_Oatlands_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?[edit]

On 25 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kirk o' Field, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 11:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Palace_-_Otford.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Palace_-_Otford.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Musical key characteristics[edit]

Hi, I took the liberty to move your section about Schubart's key characteristics from Key signature to Key (music) as I find, that they are caracteristics of keys themselves rather than of key signatures, which are merely devices of musical notation and do not necessarily correspond to the actual key of a piece or section. --FordPrefect42 00:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast to the nation[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Broadcast to the nation, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.cockedandlocked.net/archives/2007/02/history_is_repe.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 09:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hampton Court Long Water.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hampton Court Long Water.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Emerald City (song)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Emerald City (song), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www3.baylor.edu/~Richard_Veit/emerald_city.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Timerichardsolo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Timerichardsolo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rk74rg1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rk74rg1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FunPika 14:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Rk74rg1.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This image is clearly a copyright violation. The picture was taken for Rolling Stone Magazine. It is being use in an article about The Carpenters. There is no indication that Rolling Stone Magazine has released this image to be used in Wikipedia.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Rk74rg1.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that fair use statements have been updated, but I still question the legality of using this image as there is no indication of the copywrite holder has released the image and the use does not appear to fall into the category of "fair use".

The license being used states:

This tag should only be used for images of a person, product, or event that is known to have come from a press kit or similar source, for the purpose of reuse by the media.

yet the source indicated is:

Annie Leibowicz, Rolling Stone magazine

which appears to me to be an invalid license for the stated source. Dbiel ^(Talk) 20:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rk74rg1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rk74rg1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Various problems with Image:Carpenters.jpg[edit]

The image has no source, no fair use rationale, and is a replaceable fair use image. Basically in the context of an article about the Carpenters a random image is unlikely to be fair use. Megapixie (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Karencarpenter82.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Karencarpenter82.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Timerichardsolo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Timerichardsolo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carpatchrist77.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Carpatchrist77.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Carpenters[edit]

Hi, I hope you remember me. I'm the one who you sent More Songs to You a couple of years ago. I would like to work with you to get The Carpenters to be a featured article. Do you have any good images of them? — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 00:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally I remember you :-)

We can but try :-)Danny (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Elizabeth I - The Book of Hunting.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth I - The Book of Hunting.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Elizabeth I Peace Portrait.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth I Peace Portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Palace - Enfield Palace.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Palace - Enfield Palace.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Gilmour redstrat closeup.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Gilmour redstrat closeup.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danielnewman.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danielnewman.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Byrd - 2. The battell.mid or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Byrd - 3. The galliarde for the victorie.mid, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Byrd - 1. The marche before the battell.mid, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Mary I.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Queen Mary I.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabeth I Hardwick Portrait.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elizabeth I Hardwick Portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Chopin2.jpg[edit]

The file File:Chopin2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabeth I Locket Ring.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elizabeth I Locket Ring.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]