User talk:Danrivera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Danrivera, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kobe (rapper), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kobe (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kobe (rapper), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  ʄlame  14:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:454px-Eminem logo.svg.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:454px-Eminem logo.svg.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kobe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 23:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Loud tracklisting[edit]

Please can you remove the track listing as it is not official. NME have cross referenced DefPen Radio which is nowhere near an official source. It would be best if you remove it and wait for an official source. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

  1. Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Loud (Rihanna album). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
    Please do not add information to Wikipedia claiming it is found in one source when it actually isn't. That article is from the thirtieth of September, so it couldn't have mentioned anything about a potential Eminem collaboration. Thanks. Yves (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Love the Way You Lie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Where in the heck did you get the duration for a song that hasn't been released yet? Why didn't you provide a reference citation? Where is your edit summary explaining your change? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating this article[edit]

"Love the Way You Lie (Part 2)" fails WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL and is nothing but an album track not even released yet. There is no reason for this song to have its own article. You also used a fake/fan-made image as the cover art. Please stop recreating it. - eo (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MCR[edit]

Hello, the article you created 'Sing' should not be created until there are proper references for it, probably after 'The Only Hope...' has come out. Thank you for your contributions but i have reverted your edits because of this. Sorry if i sound a bit harsh, i don't mean to be. Ask if you have any questions, regards Grey Matter 23:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rihanna_SALESCOVER_small.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna_SALESCOVER_small.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Love the Way You Lie (Part II) Official Cover.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love the Way You Lie (Part II) Official Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deryck Whibley concert.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Deryck Whibley concert.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roman's Revenge[edit]

Please stop creating pages for songs that fail notability guidelines at WP:NSONG. Additionally, the source you provided did not in any way confirm the release of this track as a single. Finally, your carelessly created the article with a misspelled title: Romans's Revenge. Do not recreate this unless you can provide a reliable source for its release and show that it is notable enough for a separate article. - eo (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Eminemlive2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 12:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Eminem2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Eminemlive20102.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξxplicit 00:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Deryck Whibley concert.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξxplicit 00:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gerard Way.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξxplicit 00:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — ξxplicit 00:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ami Canaan Mann has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Please read the sources you cite before developing your conclusions about what they say. Your addition of Southpaw to the Filmography (a list of finished film works) on Eminem is woefully premature, and your listing as it being in "Post-Production" (sic) is at best misleading. In fact, the article text says, "Sutter will begin writing immediately", which is one of the clues that the movie is at the opposite end of the production arc. There is no film as yet, and until at least filming starts, there's no reason to mention it. It's still just an idea, and it may break down before there's even an actual script. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please WAIT to add any mentions of Southpaw to articles like Eminem or a template like Template:Eminem. It's way TOOSOON to make a big deal about this, as the script isn't even at a draft stage yet. Please wait until there's actual production going on, or enormous coverage about it in the mainstream press. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Southpaw (film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, A Beautiful Mind (Eminem album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. The article did not confirm the album title or the project name. The information is vague and your article contained speculations Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 8 Mile (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Your continued insistence on adding mention of Southpaw to every Eminem-related article has become disruptive. THE FILM IS NOT FINISHED YET. It has not even been written yet Please do not add it to filmographies of finished works. Do not call it a sequel to 8 Mile. Do not claim that "The film is expected to be released in 2012." There is no source for any release date.

Please DO remember to use edit summaries when you make changes and add or delete material. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Season of the Witch[edit]

Hello, why did you remove the double column setup from the "Cast" section in Season of the Witch (2011 film)? Was there a problem with the way it presented? Erik (talk | contribs) 14:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Screaming Bloody Murder (album) for deletion[edit]

The article Screaming Bloody Murder (album) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Bloody Murder (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fezmar9 (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Screaming Bloody Murder (album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Screaming Bloody Murder (album). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Syllables (Eminem song), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. If the song has not been released yet and it has not charted, the song is not notable to have an article of its own here in Wikipedia. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 17:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album Screaming Bloody Murder cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Album Screaming Bloody Murder cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 13:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 53rd Grammy Awards. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You've been told many times to add references to material you add. I'd really hate for someone to have to warn you again. Yves (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to 53rd Grammy Awards. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Again, where is your source? Yves (talk) 21:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Screaming Bloody Murder (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, Screaming Bloody Murder (album). In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 21:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Vampire Diaries[edit]

All information is there in prose, we don't need a list as well, please stop adding it. Jayy008 (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I hit rollback by mistake instead of undo on your edits - rollback not allowing you to leave an edit summary, I thought I'd leave it here for you instead. Your edits were nominally OK, but no improvement over the original, and it doesn't make sense to have the poster for part 2 as the infobox - especially as it hasn't even been released yet. a_man_alone (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Millahnna (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per WP:NFF we wait until filming as started before a film article is created. All of the production details are in the Future section of the film series page. Making an article really doesn't make since right now anyways, when there's only a section of information. The plot details you wrote is unverified and original research, which is unacceptable. Filming is scheduled to begin late next month. Also the disambiguation you added (film) in the title was unnecessary, as American Reunion will be the future article title. Thanks for understanding. —Mike Allen 23:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:51Yz7zYYQXL. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Fast Lane (Bad Meets Evil song), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 15:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuri Şahin[edit]

He is still with Dortmund, and won't sign for Madrid until the season ends on 1 July. Regards, GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Vampire Diaries[edit]

Please don't create Vampire Diaries pages unless you can fill all the info in to make them notable. See Pilot (90210 episode) for an example of what an episode page should look like. Jayy008 (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baby, You Don't Wanna Know has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, no indication of passing WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN (♫♫) 04:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Reunion for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Reunion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article This Is Our House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, non-charting song, failing WP:NMUSIC and WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 00:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of This Is Our House for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article This Is Our House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Our House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ravendrop 00:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please join my group[edit]

Please join my group
I love that you tried to make Kobe a wikipedia page cause i love eminem and we should also make one for sly jordan he sings in seduction and fastlane. i would like for you to join my group just go to GH200 page and leave a mesage or a new section on my talk but read my page first then leave a mesage we will only change and make pages for good and if someone messes with us they will get something back in return. Please join my group and get other people to join too. And if you have more questions just ask and i'll answer them. Please and Thank you. GH200 (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This Is Our House front.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This Is Our House front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stefan and Damon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Close paraphrase of Vampire Diaries entry on WIkia, and better-suited for that wiki. No sources, too much plot summary, in-universe style

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 13:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Vampire Diaries[edit]

Please stop restoring pages that have been previously deleted. Pages must conform to WP:N, if they do not, they are not allowed. If you continue your disruptive editing, I will send a warning. Jayy008 (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

American Reunion soundtrack[edit]

Hi. Can you tell me where you go the soundtrack information for American Reunion? —Mike Allen 23:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for sales of 6 million[edit]

Where did you get 6 million for the Recovery (Eminem album) article? You not only failed to give a reference, but you didn't provide an edit summary either. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 14:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Wayne & Eminem: World Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Status {talkcontribs 03:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cocaine (Eminem song) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cocaine (Eminem song). Since you had some involvement with the Cocaine (Eminem song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Evil IP address (talk) 18:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-earth characters[edit]

Hi there, there is currently a consensus that middle-earth characers info boxes do not contain images from one specific adaptation of the Lord of the Rings, where appropriate images from the published books can be used, but actors portraying the characters belong in the Adaptation sections. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Middle-earth/Standards#Character for the current convention. Of course this is subject to change but can we have a discussion there before making a large number of edits? Thanks GimliDotNet (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic 3D[edit]

Please don't add the 3D version as a separate feature to filmographies. It is just a re-release in another format. Lots of films have had 2D and 3D releases and they are not listed separately; it is still only one work. Betty Logan (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Vampire Diaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Donovan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Hailie Jade Scott Mathers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 06:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]