User talk:DapperPotato

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Price Cutter (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Darthbots! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Price Cutter[edit]

Information icon Hello, Darthbots. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Price Cutter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Price Cutter[edit]

Hello, Darthbots. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Price Cutter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CICERO-6 has been accepted[edit]

CICERO-6, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited World Defense Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Technological development. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. In addition, your contributions do not suggest that you are here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} Secretlondon (talk) 13:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DapperPotato (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I understand that I need to change my username to not contain "bot" and I have. However, I don't understand how I am not contributing constructively to the encyclopedia and would like to receive more information.Darthbots (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Renamed, and will unblock. 331dot (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Secretlondon Did you hardblock just to ensure they proposed an acceptable new username? Is there an issue with their editing that I am missing? 331dot (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry. A rename is fine. Secretlondon (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Letter Boxed has been accepted[edit]

Letter Boxed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]