User talk:Darknessitselfflames

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Drmies (talk) 03:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2015–2019, you may be blocked from editing. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 03:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 36156[edit]

UTRS appeal #36156 has been opened. @Oshwah, Muboshgu, Drmies, and GeneralNotability: Please review and opine if you wish. Silence conveys "decline unblock". --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks not good, unless one of you sees a glimmer? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ima go with NO. I've rarely seen a user so skillfully combine a complete lack of knowledge with technical incompetence, anger issues, and a total failure to read the room. Thanks User:Deepfriedokra, Drmies (talk) 13:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with Drmies. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all. I concur. I posted this too early, before appellant's responses began to deteriorate. This request is now closed. I post my response below.

I'm sorry, but as you have repeatedly inadequately addressed the reasons for your block, you are now ineligible for consideration at UTRS until six months from now. This has been an open-book test. All the policies and guidelines relating to correcting the problems you encountered and created are there for the reading. Even so, I see no indication of you actually understanding what to do and what to not do. It comes across that you don't really understand the manner in which your edits were wrong, so you cannot help but repeat them. Please consider spending that time constructively and collegially editing other Wikimedia projects and other versions of Wikipedia. Please do not evade your block or use sock puppets. After at least six months of constructive, collegial editing have passed, you may again request unblocking. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thank you.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]