User talk:DataCollectionExpert

Welcome![edit]

Hi DataCollectionExpert! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Alexander Scourby[edit]

I have reverted your edits at Alexander Scourby. You appear to be attempting to righting a great wrong, which is not Wikipedia's purpose. You may have some legitimate points to make about the copyright issues surrouding Scourby's Bible recordings, but you also appear to be throwing around a number of partial facts, assumptions, etc. to draw conclusions which cannot be verified by the sources themselves. At the very least, I believe you should address your concerns at Talk:Alexander Scourby to see if the community can come together to sort out the issues. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you position however I cited all my sources I am in no way related to this case it is an observation based on factual data I collected , however to keep things on the positive I can certainly refrain from adding any of my options or thoughts in edits moving forward.I would like to add the information that I spent a great deal of time researching after I could not find the answers I needed online. DataCollectionExpert (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alexander Scourby have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alexander Scourby was changed by DataCollectionExpert (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850092 on 2022-03-29T20:29:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alexander Scourby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a a professorial journalist I always cite my sources thanks for checking in friend of Litchfield : ) DataCollectionExpert (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Scourby, you may be blocked from editing. You're now engaged in an edit war. Continued efforts to add this contentious and poorly sourced material may get you blocked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Im only trying to make a sensible edit the other person is just removing it after I post it, what is the point of this if you are not allowed to make changes the other person clearly has a motive to make it appear this way and I have facts and cited all my claims the current page has little citation please explain what exactly I wrote that was wrong or inaccurate ? DataCollectionExpert (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexander Scourby. Andethyst (talk) 01:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

explain how making any edit whatsoever is considered vandalizing it? its lacking facts stating misinformation Im attempting to correct that? DataCollectionExpert (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Alexander Scourby include numerous unverifiable claims of persons using multiple names, forged documents (It is widely believed that agreement was forged...), etc. Clearly you believe that some wrongdoing has occurred regarding these recordings, and you have set out to research the facts and present them here. Unfortunately, this type of original research is not permitted at Wikipedia. You may want to bring your research to a legitimate news organization who can help you to organize the thoughts, edit the grammar, and perform some useful fact-checking to produce a legitimate piece of journalism for publication. If and when that happens, we might be able to cite that published source as a reliable source for writing about the matter on Wikipedia. But until then, we cannot use the material you have gathered and tried to introduce. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]