User talk:Davecringle

As an Engineer I worked with Zoo, Smile, Decca Polydor labels. It infuriates me when I see articles that are written and often corrected by individuals that have no hands on knowledge or experience of the music industry. == April 2012 ==

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Zoo Records. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Zoo Records shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Michig (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Echo & the Bunnymen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Michig (talk) 10:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Michig (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davecringle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

songspin.fm/artist/echothebunnymen and encyclopedia.sprinko.com/index.php?title=Echo_%26_The...

these are 2 internet sources to support the changes i made Davecringle (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The policy is very simple: you must not edit war, even is you think you're right. Max Semenik (talk) 14:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Those two sources are Wikipedia mirrors, so please don't use them as references here. --Michig (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andy Kanavan[edit]

The article Andy Kanavan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ... discospinster _talk 21:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Michig (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]