User talk:DavidDonovanMiller

There are some issues with the Wikipedia website for Dr. Richard Pestell. Is it possible for someone to help me resolve these issues? I'm new to Wikipedia so forgive me if I'm violating some rules or if i don't sign this post correctly. Anyone looking to help me can email me at ddm54@outlook.com with comments or suggestions--DavidDonovanMiller (talk) 10:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David MillerDavidDonovanMiller (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Richard Pestell— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Pestell with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DVdm, I'm User:DavidDonovanMiller. If you have an issue with Dr. Pestell's page, why not offer to edit the parts that you have a problem with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidDonovanMiller (talk • contribs) 17:56, 6 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.

It doesn't work that way. The tags are there for those who are interested in the page. So the idea is that you take care of it, not by removing the tags, but by improving the article. THen the tags can be removed. - DVdm (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DVdm, It's DavidDonovanMiller It would be useful if you provided specific details regarding any content you have an issue with on the Richard Pestell page. With this information, I can be more specific when I reach out to the Wikipedia community for help. ThanksDavidDonovanMiller (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use proper talk page indentation, as outlined in wp:Talk page formatting. Thanks.

I noticed your removal of two wp:PEACOCK phrases ([1]). Good. I have marked 5 reference links in the article as dead ([2]). That way either proper alternatives can be found, or the claimed content can be removed per wp:unsourced. That said, please go to the article talk page Talk:Richard_Pestell to find out why the original tags were placed in the article. This kind of conversation belongs on the article talk page, not here on user talk. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Pestell, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]