User talk:DavidJMoss

Please, will someone edit my very first entry, Tobey C. Moss (Art Dealer) and tell me how to finish making it acceptable for publishing. I must be 90% there. Thanks. David Moss

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobey C. Moss (Art Dealer) (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobey C. Moss (Art Dealer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tobey C. Moss (Art Dealer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, DavidJMoss! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DavidJMoss. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Tobey C. Moss‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You appear to share a last name with the subject of this article. If you are connected to this person, it is a conflict of interest. Jooojay (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Jooojay for your comments on the page Tobey C. Moss‎ and I hear your confusion over terms like docent. I do mean Museum Docent, someone who leads free tours throughout the museum commenting on pieces on the wall and soliciting reactions from the tour participants. I also hear your concern about conflict of interest. That is why I re-published the December 28th page in February to only use wording from established sources like the Getty Research Institute and the Los Angeles Times and the University of California Los Angeles(UCLA) Special Collections. Are you commenting on that version? I included many inline citations from those venerable sources. And, as the son of retired 92-year-old Tobey C. Moss, I would have much preferred waiting until The Getty Research Institute posted this page, but they don't do that, or not in a timely fashion. I wanted to see her contribution to the art world in print, especially women artists and Latino artists and Southern California artists, available to Wikipedia users, before she dies, not 10 years afterwards. As for International art dealer, I also cite her 47 contributions to the collection of the British Museum, as an example. Can you tell me how I can improve that latest version from February. DavidJMoss (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/DavidJMoss|

Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery

I saw your post at the Teahouse. I looked at the article, and have renamed it to Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery, since the article is about the gallery, more or less. There is certainly not enough material to have an article on "Tobey C. Moss". Regarding the article: we rarely publish articles on galleries, since they are rarely notable. Galleries often deal with other people who are notable (the artists), but newspapers and magazines rarely write about the actual galleries. Items like the British Museum having bought 47 works from her are of no consequence at all; selling something does not make someone notable, by our criteria. If you can dig up a half dozen or so newspaper or magazine or book profiles of Tobey C. Moss, or the gallery, then there may be some hope. Otherwise, unfortunately I do not think there is much chance this will be published. Possibly (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

In response to talk, the main reason I thought this gallery itself was notable, not just the artists it represents, is because this gallery MAKES the market for many of these artists. They would not be notable artists if there weren't someone tirelessly working to promote them. And the duration of the gallery is 40 years! That is a long time for a gallery to exist and to make a mark on the art world, which this gallery did. Also, this gallery, unlike many others, spent a tremendous amount of time and energy teaching art history, teaching about the artists, the period, the various art movements, the media (lithography). It was not just four walls to show art. Lastly, this gallery's records were noteworthy enough that the Getty Research Institute, the Smithsonian Institution, and the UCLA Special Collections department all chose to preserve the gallery records. Not many galleries are given that much space and attention by those venerable institutions. Thank you for hearing me out. And, how do I impress these facts upon the editors who will choose whether to include this page or delete it. DavidJMoss (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobey C. Moss Gallery (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobey C. Moss Gallery (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery

Hello, DavidJMoss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tobey C. Moss Gallery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)