User talk:DavidexUSA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:05unconf gallery1.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:05unconf gallery1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Shangarai Chasset[edit]

Great job on the Shangarai Chasset article. I am taking the liberty of creating seperate articles for all the rabbis of Shangarai Chasset. I am basically using what you wrote in the Shangarai Chasset article. I will later delete all the info regarding the rabbis at the Shangarai Chasset article leaving only a hyperlinked list to the main articles of the rabbis. Of course the rest of the Shangarai Chasset article will remain intact. In addition, as your article is unreferenced I am adding my own reference. The reference given might not technically discuss or cover all the info in the article, but it is important to have a reference otherwise there's a risk that the article will go up for Afd. Obviously, if you have the reference that you got your info from then delete my reference.--AmerHisBuff 23:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can appreciate the idea of each rabbi having their own article, but am wary that overzealous editors may delete their articles, stating that the person is "not notable." Many of the rabbis notoriety only comes as part of their affiliation with the Shangarai Chasset congregation, which is why I left them all on this page. I will reference the sources on the articles you moved as I have time - I have most of the sources in a separate listing. DavidexUSA 11:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)DavidexUSA[reply]
Hi David, all I did on the Shangarai Chasset article was fix a typo, misspelling of Louisiana.... ~Eliz81(C) 22:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akselrud.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Akselrud.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 11:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Hart for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Hart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Hart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lettlerhellocontribs 17:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]