User talk:Davidmack

Help on book summaries[edit]

I see there are Wiki guidelines on how to write about fiction. It says "A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger article." Is there anything on how to write about non-fiction? In the biographical article on Anthony de Mello I would like to add a section about some of his writing, summarising and discussing some of the main features of his thinking with short referenced quotes.

Not that I know of! You can check out How to write a great article for some general tips about the process, but my guess is that you'll be fine. (Anyone conscientious enough to ask this kind of question will probably make an excellent contribution to an article.) The best thing would be to check out other non-fiction writers to see what their articles say, and mimic that. I'm sorry if this wasn't more helpful! Feel free to ask further questions on my talk page. Cheers. -- Merope ^Talk 03:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help on deleting a page[edit]

I created a page called Category:Nondestructive Testing before I realised my mistake and created another called Category:Nondestructive testing with the proper title case. How do I delete the first one?

paste {{db-author}} on the page. Cbrown1023 00:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I might have made in confusing for you... you would paste {{tl|db-author}} only if you wanted to make a link to it... if you want to substitute it then you paste {{tl|db-author}} which gives...

I deleted it for you. No worries. Best, --MCB 03:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ronald McDonald-TV.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronald McDonald-TV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Research for the Alcoholics Anonymous article[edit]

Thank you for doing the leg-work and the research. I do share some AO's sentiments about AA not granting more access to the articles -- definately doesn't seem like HOW. But it was good to see the information he cited put in context. -- Craigtalbert 00:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the photo from NDT page[edit]

Hi, I see that you have removed my photo that I have taken in my NDT shop indicating that it is a commercila photo. I do not understand your point of view. For example is it a commercila photo if you put an Airbus a/c photo in an article? I have installed the photo in order to give the readers an idea about an test tool. As I have no relations with GE other than being an user, I have no purpose such as doing advertaisement of a compony or product. Thanks in advance for your answer back.--Plenumchamber 11:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plenumchamber, thanks for the message. Please see my response on the NDT talk page. — DavidMack 15:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Application for membership in the Sorcerers of St. Jerome[edit]

I want to join! JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome. You're the second member in this cabal. Place

{| style="float:right; background:none;"

|{{User:Davidmack/St Jerome}}

|}

or something like that on your user page. If there's too much of a rush on membership we may have to install an admission requirement, like finding Shakespeare's mother's maiden name. — DavidMack 23:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information on the Disease Model and its detractors[edit]

Just thought I'd pass on this article since I know you're interested: http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2007/07/junkies_and_victims.html -- Craigtalbert 18:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also came across these today:

Sorry that I've been AWOL from the AA article, just got tired of the back and forth. -- Craigtalbert 18:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links. I was thinking that I was doing way too much input into the discussion anyway. — DavidMack 14:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a tough article to work on. Just had a look at it discussion since I archived it last time -- brutal! Hopefully it will calm down and some point. Anyway, came across this study on AA and addicted physicians, just thought it was interesting. -- Craigtalbert 17:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...[edit]

--nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 03:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Trudeau[edit]

Could you please add some references for the new material you added to this article and, if you have them, references for some of the other unreferenced material. Thank you.Mysteryquest 20:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't add anything, just cleaned up a bit. I do have a collection of PDFed papers on Trudeau, if I ever get time to add them. Thanks. — DavidMack 22:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5% Attrition Rate Mentioned on LifeRing's blog[edit]

I think it would be very interesting if you left a comment on this post:

http://liferingconvenor.blogspot.com/2007/12/once-again-on-aa-dropout-rate.html

-- Craigtalbert (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. — DavidMack (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Match Comment[edit]

Davidmack, you posed the following question:

I need to repeat a question from above: The article states that Cutler and Fishbain criticise MATCH based on results from zero-treatment group, and also that Peele accuses MATCH of not having a zero-treatment group. Can someone please explain this? Also, would the person who put in the Cutler and Fishbain critique be willing to add the MATCH rebuttal? Thanks. (Again.) — DavidMack (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this got answered before, but my understanding is that Peele complains that there was not a zero-treatment CONTROL group built into the study so that comparisons could be made about absolute effectiveness of the three treatment groups. This is a complaint about the experimental design, not about the interpretation. However, since the purpose of the study was not to determine absolute effectiveness, I don't understand the complaint. C&F used the dropouts from the various treatment groups, since these subjects were followed as well as the non-dropouts. The main conclusion was that most of the reported effects occurred either after a single treatment or, in many cases after no treatment at all. This is an interesting result to be sure, but I don't know what it means.Desoto10 (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying control group vs drop-outs. I think Peele was complaining about no control group and about the recovery rate of drop-outs because he argues that most treatment is useless and that natural healing is the only way out. Hence MATCH did not address his key concerns. — DavidMack (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:AA[edit]

Something weird happened at your last change to the talk page, and you made some changes you obviously didn't intend. You might take a look. I considered fixing at myself, but I'm very reluctant to touch others' talk page changes. PhGustaf (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — DavidMack (talk) 18:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cult#External links[edit]

David, your geocities page called Agent Green made it to the cult page. It is beeing Juxtaposted next to Agent Orange to allow a more educated read of his cite.Coffeepusher (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good news, thank you. — DavidMack (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davidmack. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Phased array ultrasonics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Array (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Stress corrosion cracking revealed by magnetic particles.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stress corrosion cracking revealed by magnetic particles.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Wet magnetic particle testing on a pipeline.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wet magnetic particle testing on a pipeline.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Davidmack. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Davidmack. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Davidmack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Davidmack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Types of scientific fallacy has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Types of scientific fallacy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]