User talk:Deanmb.dnd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Verifying identity[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! :) There are a couple of quick things I need to speak to you about regarding your account.

First, it sounds as though this account is going to be operated by multiple people, although perhaps not. I refer to my workplace as "we" sometimes, too. :) If you are thinking of using this account for multiple people, please be aware that Wikipedia has rules prohibiting this; see WP:ROLE. If others in your department desire to edit Wikipedia, they should each create their own account.

Secondly, since we have no means of verifying your identity at the time of account creation, I'm afraid that we cannot accept content that you donate that is copyrighted to the Department of National Defense for the Philippines without your verifying that you are authorized to release this content. This is a fairly simple matter of contacting a volunteer email line from an address identifiable with the DND. If you explain to them that you need to verify your identity and affirm that you are an authorized representative of the Department of National Defense, they should be able to put a note on your userpage that will confirm that you have contacted them from an authorized email address and what you have said. The address to write for this is info-en@wikimedia.org. If you wish to do this, you should ask in your email that they flag your accounts on both English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. This may help prevent images that you contribute being deleted, although you may still be asked to provide specific permission for individual images.

Finally, I would like to make sure that you are aware of our conflict of interest guidelines. Your assistance in keeping information up to date and accurate is very welcome, but there are some special concerns with editing by people who are directly associated with organizations. You will want to be particularly careful to meet the core content policies of verifiability and neutrality and to avoid "original research". If you read over that guideline I've linked in the first sentence of this paragraph and follow the recommendations, you should be fine.

While I'm here, I'd like to note that another administrator has deleted File:Official Photo of BRP Gregorio del Pilar (PF15).jpg because the image isn't really a "non-free historic image", as these are designated on Wikipedia. Non-free historic images are images that themselves have historic significance; a couple of examples that come to mind for me when I think of "non-free historic images" would include the one in the infobox at Kent State shootings (the picture itself won a Pulitzer prize and, as the article says, became "one of the most enduring images of the anti-Vietnam War movement" in the United States) and the terribly sad picture of Phan Thi Kim Phuc at the top of her article after she's been doused with Napalm. (I wanted to use a happier picture and had thought of a famous picture of a kiss on victory day during World War II, but couldn't find it on our project.) In both these cases, the images are themselves iconic; they've won awards and people have written extensively about them in articles and books.

If you need assistance as you edit, including needing advice about non-free image use on Wikipedia, there are several points where you can reach out. Wikipedia:New contributors' help page/questions is especially designed for newer contributors to ask questions about how to edit or how policies or practices work. It's a pretty straightforward venue that is manned by volunteers experienced at helping newcomers learn their way around. There is also the slightly more social Wikipedia:Teahouse where you can also ask questions and expect experienced assistance.

Again, welcome. Happy editing. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Deanmb.dnd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Green Giant (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:13, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]