User talk:DebtMan

Welcome!

Hello, DebtMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! L Kensington (talk • contribs) 04:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article General Juan N. Álvarez International Airport, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hawk De Mexico for deletion[edit]

The article Hawk De Mexico is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk De Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travelbird (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Airports in Ontario, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You changed the template to "Airports in Mexico," which then cascaded to numerous articles where this template is used. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258)[edit]

You keep adding information on the fate of HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258) in front of the citations. But the the information you keep adding is not backed up by the citations. If you have additional information, please can you add it after the citations, and provide a citation saying where you got this information from.--Toddy1 (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Italia Tour Airlines[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Italia Tour Airlines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. De728631 (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating blatant hoax articles such as USS Proteus (CVL-1). I note that other articles you've created have been deleted as hoaxes or unverifiable and material you've added to articles has been removed as being falisfied, so this appears to be a long-running problem with your editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the benefit of any reviewing admins, I've been through this editor's military-related edits (which are the ones I'm most competent to spot problems with, and have found quite a few more additional hoaxes. This is definitely a long-running problem with this editor. Nick-D (talk) 10:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DebtMan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

'I have contributed valuably to wikipedia articles that did not exist and I think it illogical that block only one article that had few references, and also consider unjust, bringing the contributions they make, I block'

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
USS Proteus (CVL-1) didn't lack references, it was a hoax, wasting considerable amounts of other editors time in checking, tagging and deleting. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DebtMan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to deactivate my account because I do not find anything useful, practical or beneficial. Moreover, it seems unnecessary, since I believe sufficient operational and network services and add more services, including this, "he takes time and thus I see internet effectiveness conditioned

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. Accounts are not "deactivated", unless you mean "blocked", and this one already is. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Air4 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ARTICLE NAME is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARTICLE NAME until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --FoxyOrange (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Exact Air for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exact Air is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exact Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]