User talk:DeclandecoDoyle

You are lying about my entry. It is 100% correct

June 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ben Wallace (politician) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ben Wallace (politician) was changed by DeclandecoDoyle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857009 on 2022-06-06T11:19:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ben Wallace (politician). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Wallace (politician), you may be blocked from editing. — RayleeKL ^«talk» 11:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If your sole purpose on Wikipedia is to call everybody a liar, and to do the same thing in an article, I don't see how you can productively edit here. You are welcome to change my mind, starting with abandoning the word "liar". Controversial allegations about living indiciduals must be backed up by multiple high quality sources, and should be made by editors who do not carry a particular animus. Acroterion (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bots that censored my factual amendment are unregulated propagandists[edit]

Liars DeclandecoDoyle (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rage doesn't make edits stick. We aren't bots, we're people, and we expect you to provide something other than unsupported denunciations. Specifically, citations to responsible journalism or academic sources, that plainly state your assertions in a way that can be cited. Read my advice above. If you call people liars again, you'll lose access to this talkpage. Read the biographies of living persons policy. Acroterion (talk) 12:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you lie. I cited the most authoritative source possible re the Northern conflict. You have completely disregarded that fact.

Why don't you do a little research and you'll find I'm right DeclandecoDoyle (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think I'm lying about what Wikipedia policy demands of editors who post defamatory statements about living persons, there's little I can do to help you. We expect detailed, specific references with concordance across multiple reliable sources, not demands that other editors do research for you. The burden is upon the editor proposing the change to back up what they assert, pointing to specific supporting material by direct link, date, page number, etc. We don't infer things from large bodies of material or demand that end users read through volumes of material to get at a specific fact. You may not use the encyclopedia for broad-brush accusations or for poorly-attributed defamation. I've removed talkpage access to prevent further disruption. If you want to explain how you will respect the encyclopedia's policies, you may do so via WP:UTRS. Acroterion (talk) 16:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]