User talk:Deevlash

Welcome!

Hello, Deevlash, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Your article, Deevlash has been moved to your User page: User:Deevlash. This is the page you should use for telling others about yourself. Articles should only be created on Notable People, per Wikipedia guidelines. Fan-1967 22:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deevlash[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to your user page (User:Deevlash), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).

Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Calton | Talk 01:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rangers liquidation[edit]

Rangers were liquidated in 2012 they cannot add more titles. Deevlash (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are contrary to the consensus on this article and are not in line with cited reliable sources. Please stop doing them. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history at Rangers F.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Deevlash reported by User:Escape Orbit (Result: ). Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made my changes, which are factual, and they've been changed. Yet somehow I'm in the wrong? Absurd. Deevlash (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Being right, or even being right and citing sources, is not a defence against WP:Three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further—and if you had been to the talk page, you would be aware of this, Rangers F.C. is subject to an active arbitration remedy, and users are limited to one revert per 24 hours.

Since you are now aware of this restriction, you would be subject to a block if you reverted again to breach it. —C.Fred (talk) 12:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Janey Godley have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Janey Godley was changed by Deevlash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951666 on 2022-12-30T23:13:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]