User talk:Deflective/Archive 1

IPA template

I slightly modified your the template {{IPAc-en}} that you have been constructing. Hope I did not break anything. How about using the icon for the link to the info file? −Woodstone (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

My preference is to make it as clean as possible, the superscript i takes a minimal amount of space and is easily ignored when it's not needed. The blue speakers make some sense since we can't do a standard mouseover colour change. I changed the span mouseovers for the speaker icons to innate img mouseovers.

Hopefully we're approaching a usable template =) --Deflective (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I hate to revert all the work you've been doing. Could you *please* fix the underlining? It's been months. kwami (talk) 09:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I do not see underlining with Firefox or IE, what browser are you using? --deflective (talk) 13:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Firefox 3.6 on a PC. kwami (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

We've tracked it down to different skins. --deflective (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, looks good. I've just noticed that you're transcribing /Vər/ as two or three parameters, whereas the template is set up to link them as one: /ər/, /ɪər/. This is particularly important for non-rhotic place names, since for locals they generally won't end in 'r as in rye'. kwami (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The Greasemonkey script seems to miss it when it's at the end of a word (or maybe middle, I forget offhand). I try to catch it manually but sometimes it slips through in the middle of a large batch of changes.

btw, other problems I've encountered have been added to {{IPAc-en}}'s talk page. -- deflective (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Others I've noticed are /oʊ/ and we're missing keys for /ɚ, ɝː/. kwami (talk) 01:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I'll need you to add the new keys to Help:IPA for English#Key, or at least write the mouseovers in Template_talk:IPAc-en so they can be added to the template (plus SAMPA translations if appropriate). -- deflective (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, will try to get to that. No emergency.

Looks like the prob is with all final digraphs: London, Bristol, & Mexico, for example (which I just fixed). kwami (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

You may be interested to learn that in the case of Herefordshire, and other English shires, the unpronounced final r represents not only the local, but also the regional, national, and globally widespread pronunciation throughout the world where the language is still based on British English. There are various opinions as to which version should be shown, that may or may not affect your policy when editing articles.--Kudpung (talk) 07:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I came close to reverting one of your recent edits, to Tristan da Cunha – it looked like vandalism, adding a line of tiny dots under the IPA for no reason. But I checked, and eventually found Template talk:IPAc-en, which explains that I am seeing the tiny dots because of a skin issue (I use Firefox 3.6.3 and Internet Explorer 8). I have tried all nine Wikipedia skins, they all show me the lines of tiny dots.

To stop people from mistaking your changes for vandalism, I suggest that you put something on your user page explaining what you are doing with the IPAc-en template; and maybe also explaining what we can change to stop seeing the tiny dots. Maproom (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Dotted underlines are used to indicate that there is additional information available in the mouseover. It is intentionally kept for now so that people will know if the IPA has them available, it will be removed once migration is complete and the vast majority of IPA has mouseovers.

You do make a good point about updating my user page. --deflective (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Uranus

Hello,

Something you did to the Uranus article put the following text in one of the citations:

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0034-4885/65/12/201 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0034-4885/65/12/201 end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0034-4885/65/12/201 end_of_the_skype_highlighting/r21201.pdf

It used to look like this:

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0034-4885/65/12/201/r21201.pdf

Please could you check? Thanks.—RJH (talk) 22:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know about this. the change has been reverted and the plugin that skype installed on my browser is gone. -- deflective (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing the article.—RJH (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:PseudopodLogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PseudopodLogo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Pseudopod episodes

I have nominated List of Pseudopod episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pseudopod episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whenaxis (talk) 11:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Avril Lavigne

Hi Deflective, can you head over to the discussion I started regarding your template—it's specific to this article. I just want your input, I'm not "startin' something" lol. Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 08:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

IPA help

Hi, I noticed that you changed the pronunciation template in one of the Hudson Valley portal articles. I'm unfamiliar with IPA and the template in question, so could you please take a look at the other descriptions on Portal:Hudson Valley/Selected biography and update them accordingly? --Gyrobo (talk) 19:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

We're gradually converting all pages to use {{IPAc-en}} so it would happen eventually, but I converted your other portal articles now so it will be consistent. If you want to it yourself on other articles there is a Greasemonkey script that will do the conversion, you'll need Firefox with the Greasemonkey extension to use it. --deflective (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! --Gyrobo (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

error

Hi Deflective,

This[1] conversion resulted in an error (no pipe separating the icon parameter from the pronunciation). I don't know if it was automated and there were others like it. — kwami (talk) 11:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I'm not sure how this is happening, I'll keep a closer eye on it from now on.

btw, you can find a list converted IPA that contain improper English symbols at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:IPAc-en_confirm. -- deflective (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

→ Template talk:IPAc-en/Archive 1#.22Listen.22_icon_without_an_audio_file_is_inappropriate

Heyo. Wanted to give you a heads up before you made another 5,000 inclusions: this unlinked volume icon is confusing and someone is going to have to go about removing it from every inclusion. Do us a favor and don't add it any more in the meantime? TIA ¦ Reisio (talk) 15:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

It'll be a simple matter to change the meaning of the icon flag if that's the decision we reach. No need to fragment the implementation while we wait. -- deflective (talk) 19:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

It would be simple, yes, assuming you can find one of our over one-thousand-seven-hundred admins who can take two seconds to fix it. If it's not fixed by the next time I have enough spare time to fix it myself, I'll go ahead and fix it myself. ¦ Reisio (talk) 04:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

There are a couple other small tweaks that I'll make if the decision is to change it. First, the decision needs to be made to change it. -- deflective (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Was made already. ¦ Reisio (talk) 07:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

You've decided this, have you? Using exclamation marks and sentence fragments ends the consensus process? -- deflective (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

No, one person's suggestion to undo something patently silly standing unopposed for over a week ends the consensus process. Two persons ends it all the more. Not that one needs consensus to fix something like this. ¦ Reisio (talk) 22:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Unopposed except for the guy that opposed it? The first guy who brought up the issue included viable issues, ones that were discussed and taken into consideration when the template was created. Changing it now may very well be the right thing to do, but you jumping in with contentless posts and groundless ridicule doesn't sway my opinion in the slightest. -- deflective (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Are you talking about Woodstone? He asserted no opposition, but merely suggested an alternative to fixing it. Why would I want to sway your opinion if you hold approximately the same view as myself? ¦ Reisio (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

respellings

Hi,

There's now no need to use {{sm}} or <small> with respellings. In fact, doing so makes the formatting look a bit off, and they won't respond to future tinkering. Here's an example of proper formatting. (Also, these aren't the same consonant.)

Ah, I hadn't seen all the Portal transclusions of IPAc-en_confirm. Will check them out. — kwami (talk) 07:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

The extent of my involvement with respellings is adding the {{respell}} template to respellings that are written out in quotations or the like. I will remove the {{sm}} template when I do that from now on. -- deflective (talk) 14:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I know that's all you were doing. It's just that I cleaned up all of the respelling transclusions, and then when I went back over them for something I forgot, several new ones popped up. I wanted to let you know so we can at least start off with that template being used consistently. (Not that it will stay that way for long.) — kwami (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Pronunciation icon at moai not working

Hello, Deflective. I just clicked on the pronunciation icon in the moai article and nothing happened. Can you fix it? Thanks! (Oh, also the icon in the Easter Island article). --Kenatipo ^speak! 16:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

The black pronunciation icon shows that an audio file needs to be uploaded (much like a red text link). I added the audio pronunciation for moai, the blue speaker should work now. --deflective (talk) 23:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, dude. They work like a charm! --Kenatipo ^speak! 00:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I believe that when people (like me!) click on a pronunciation icon, whatever color it is, they expect to hear the sound or be taken to a window where they can click on the play icon to hear the sound. The pronunciation icon should never be added without the sound file attached and ready to play. --Kenatipo ^speak! 18:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

IPAc-en template broken

I'm not sure if you still maintain Template:IPAc-en, but it appears to be broken. It always produces "/[[Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key|??]]/" whenever it's used. –Temporal User (Talk) 07:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it only produces that when misused. That's a link to a category for mistranscribed IPA, which unfortunately shows up in the document. But I've gone through everything in main and portal space (I think), so this should only be an issue in things like archives and talk pages. (It turns out a lot of the hits weren't even English, and this is a quick way of ferreting them out so the proper template can be used.)

Yes, there aren't any more articles trickling into the category list (sometimes it takes a while), so I think I got them all. From now on, anyone using transcriptions that it doesn't support and therefore can't help with will make a mess, so it will be obvious they're doing something wrong. — kwami (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

IPA

Thanks for updating the IPA on Jereboam Beauchamp. I don't know much about IPA, but I do know a few articles that need pronunciations added. If I could identify those articles (probably fewer than 10) and make some attempt at communicating their pronunciations to you, would you add the IPA? If so, please drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks. Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 14:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm willing to help too, if you can describe the pronunciation well enough for it to be unambiguous. — kwami (talk) 20:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't consider myself particularly good at using IPA (the conversion process is largely automated) but I could probably help with something like this. The best thing to do is to upload an audio file to Wikimedia commons so I can hear it. Send me a link to the audio file & article and I'll link the two with IPA. -- deflective (talk) 15:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to be so long about getting back to you; I failed to get your talk page on my watchlist. I have limited access to a microphone, so it might take some time to do this. Let me try to describe one and see how that goes. They're all pretty simple, just non-intuitive.

John Rowan – the first syllable rhymes with "cow", not with "blow", as expected. The stress is on the first syllable. The second syllable is pronounced as "en". The same IPA should probably be added to the various places and things named for Rowan, including Rowan County, Kentucky, Rowan County War, Morehead-Rowan County Airport, Morehead-Rowan County Clyde A. Thomas Regional Airport, and Rowan County Senior High School.

If this makes sense, I'll give you a few more. Thanks to you both in advance. Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 13:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Conversion problems

Hi Deflective,

In transcriptions like this one, there is no syllabic n, so |ən| is not appropriate. (Similarly for -ian, where the ə follows a vowel, here, where the l falls between two vowels, etc.) Could you transcribe these |ə|n| etc. when they're not syllabic? I'm currently going through and re-converting |ən| etc. to |ə|n| and |t|ju etc. to |tj|u. There are quite a few of them. — kwami (talk) 20:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I probably can't do this simply because I don't know how. I can't even tell the difference, really, between |ə|n| and |ən|.

It's kinda frustrating how ambiguous the phonetic alphabet is. How does a phonetic symbol being context sensitive make any sense? -- deflective (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

It's English, or English dialects, that are context-sensitive, and an early decision not to transcribe too much detail. But IPAc-en indicates more detail than IPA-en does, because it forces a particular reading of the IPA key, so additional analysis is required.

|ən| (and əm, əl, ər) are listed as being syllabic consonants in some dialects. That can't happen after a vowel, so any time there's a preceding vowel, they should be |ə|n|. Also, it can't happen between vowels, because then the n, m, l, or r link to the following syllable. (Except for compound words maybe.) I don't know what all the factors are, but if you have a dictionary that transcribes them ᵊn or n̩, that will help.

|j| (or |y|) before u or ʊ should be joined to a preceding t, d, n, s, z, θ, l, unless it's a separate syllable, since it's tj, dj, nj, etc. that the pop-ups explain as being the sounds in tune, dew, new. If you know GA, then any /j/ you don't pronounce should be joined with the preceding C. — kwami (talk) 22:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to keep an eye out for this stuff but I know I won't catch all of it.

Another item of note, if English templates aren't appropriate for a pronunciation (eg, J. M. Coetzee) then reverting it back to {{pron-en}} will just get it caught in the next batch of automated changes. Maybe {{IPA}} would be better. -- deflective (talk) 23:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Whatever you catch will help. Doesn't matter too much if you don't get all of them, as there are always going to be errors introduced on pages as soon as you leave!

English templates are fine, just not IPAc-en. If we use IPA, then the reader won't get proper support, and it will be missed in maintenance.

With the respell template, this edit shifted the stress from the final to the penult. If you want final stress, just add |'}} at the end.

I see you're still using the 'icon' parameter. Isn't that deprecated? At least, that's what it says on the IPAc-en doc page. Also, it seems to me that parentheses don't help any if the only thing in them is IPAc-en. This seems cleaner IMO. — kwami (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

There should be no situation where old English templates can represent a pronunciation that {{IPAc-en}} cannot. If this is the case please let me know why and I'll update IPAc-en.

The pronunciation of a word at the top of the page goes in parenthesis because it is part of the information block that often follows the word (it also includes entomology, birth/death dates, etc). IPA without parenthesis works when IPA is the only part of this block on the page, but it becomes messy if even just {{respell}} is included as well. In order to standardize pages, all of them should include parenthesis.

As far as I know, there is no resolution of the icon issue. When it was brought up in IPAc-en's talk page there were more people is favour of keeping it than dropping it. A couple of the people trying to drop it were aggressive about it, I suspect they edited the documentation before consensus was reached.

Either way, there are now several thousand pages that use the icon flag. If the consensus to deprecate it is ever reached then the template will need to be updated to disable the icon flag. Nothing is accomplished by fragmenting calls to IPAc-en now. -- deflective (talk) 16:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Superscript letters are not supported. I think I added in support for hyphens. — kwami (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

audio files

Hi again,

Because of an excess of parser calls, audio files now need to be specifically called with audio=. If an audio file appears without being called by audio=, the article will appear in the ill-formed IPA category. The upside, beside server efficiency, is that it no longer matters where the audio file appears: When converting from pron-en or IPA-en, you can just leave it at the end if you like. — kwami (talk) 09:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Agata (given name)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Agata (given name) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. NeoUrfahraner (talk) 10:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Scientific names of organisms

As I don't know what other articles you've been to, please do not remove italicization of scientific names in articles. If you've done so in articles other than pili nut, please revert them. They must always be italicized (unless the rest of the text itself is italicized, then it shouldn't be). Please see our article for Binomial nomenclature#Writing binomial names.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 09:33, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

My mistake, it won't happen again. --deflective (talk) 15:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Loughinisland

Regarding this edit, would you mind revisiting and correcting. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

It will be corrected (the template adds it to a category), hopefully within a week or two. --deflective (talk) 15:56, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

OK. Ya learn somethin' new every day around here. RashersTierney (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

IPAC?

I'm curious about your change on Falkland Islands. What is the purpose. Wee Curry Monster talk 08:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

It gives a mouse-over preview of the IPA symbols, which is more convenient than just the key. — kwami (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

bad IPA edits

Please stop changing List of shibboleths etc. Your edits are incorrect. You are also still incorrectly converting syllabic consonants, which is already a headache to fix. And now you've taken to deleting pronunciations that do not fit into your IPAc-en template, which is close to vandalism. If they do not fit your template, just leave them alone! Maybe you could tag them with <!--do not convert to IPAc-en-->, and program your bot to ignore such tagged transcriptions? If you come up with a tag, I'll be happy to help you apply it. We'll be left with a few dozen IPA-en transclusions, which can be handled at a latter date if need be. — kwami (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

The conversion process uses the what links here page. The transclusions are always in the same order so if a change gets reverted it stays at the top of the list and it's converted first the next time a batch is run.

We already have a tag, the Ill-formatted IPAc-en transclusions. What advantage is there in having another tag doing the same thing? I'll be running conversion batches through the holidays, if you can leave them unreverted for a couple weeks you can revert them all later and keep those two or three dozen incidents of pron-en around.

The List of Shibboleths being is converted straight over, if IPAc-en is incorrect then the pron-en is also incorrect. What difference does it make what template it's in?

Finally, I just don't have a good grasp of syllabic consonants. This isn't something I'll be able to recognize during conversion. If you can provide me with a complete and exhaustive rule-set I can look at programming it into the bot. It'll be a lot of work but there are tens of thousands of conversions to go so it should be worth it. -- deflective (talk) 07:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I meant a tag that the bot would recognize, so that it would avoid repeating the edit.

Sure, I can leave this alone for a while, just fixing the ones where the transcription is wrong.

I don't know about a rule set for syllabic C's. I'd have to look for one myself. You don't normally get them before vowels, for example, nor before consonants in the same syllable (at least not /l, m, n/). But it also depends on morphology, so would require some manual oversight. — kwami (talk) 07:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

As I've mentioned before, IPAc-en implements all IPA from Wikipedia:IPA for English. This is the same page that pron-en links to. If a transclusion of pron-en uses IPA that isn't part of Wikipedia's set then either that transclusion is in error and should be changed or the new IPA should be added to Wikipedia's set (and IPAc-en). There should be no situation where IPA is acceptable in pron-en but not in IPAc-en. -- deflective (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that article included dialectical forms which were not supported by the template, and the autoconversion was incorrect in at least one case. — kwami (talk) 23:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

If it's not supported by IPAc-en then it's not supported by pron-en. Why does it matter if it's in one incorrect template or another? -- deflective (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

In this case, it wasn't using either template, just plain {{IPA}}, which you were converting as well. I think I fixed up the article so that your next pass won't have any problems. — kwami (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Poincaré conjecture is an example of a transcription that isn't supported by IPAc-en even though it's supported by the IPA key. The problem is that we don't have a phonemic transcription for rhoticized vowels, so when the stress mark occurs before the /r/, what's left is not an accepted input. I can't think of an easy way around it. — kwami (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I see. We could brute force it and create a complete set of entries where there is a syllable break before the /r/. It isn't elegant but it'd get the job done. -- deflective (talk) 06:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Either that, or we could give it a phonemic transcription. IPAc-en and respell would no longer match, but that's not a big deal, they don't really need to match. (They don't really match as it is.) To be consistent, though, we might want a phonemic transcription whenever the ar is intervocalic, but I don't know how well that would play out. I've always been uncomfortable with these situations, even with the old IPA-en template. — kwami (talk) 07:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure how a phonemic transcription would be different from the current implementation. What would Poincaré conjecture look like? -- deflective (talk) 00:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks: IPA

Thank you for the improvement to the IPA on two of the articles which I wrote: Claire Falkenstein and Barbara Longhi. To say that I am not well-versed in IPA is a gross understatement; it took me an extraordinarily long time to construct the IPA for each of those. I would assume that a large percentage of Wiki readers are equally IPA-illiterate, so the mouseover hints are extremely useful. Thanks again! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

You're most welcome. That template was created because I had the same problems with IPA. My understanding of IPA is still limited but I've tried to learn enough to be a bridge between pronunciation people and average Wikipedia users. -- deflective (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Sound file missing

Please note that a sound icon is added when you use the {{IPAc-en}} template. Please don't add the speaker icon, if you don't add the sound/pronounciation file. Thanks. Meewam (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

See the template talk page. -- deflective (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

It's an unresolved discussion with the added info that "existing code still leads to violations of MOS:ICON." Please read the documentation regarding the use of {{IPAc-en}} and note the inclusion of an audio file via the audio= parameter. Thanks. - Meewam (talk) 20:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Read the discussion. Whether or not it violates policy is exactly what's debated. If you want to add to the discussion, that's the place to do it. -- deflective (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Read the documentation. Whether or not it's being discussed is not important as long as you adhere to what's the current policy. If you want to change the policy, add to the discussion; that's the place to do it. Thanks. Meewam (talk) 04:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm very familiar with the documentation since I wrote it and the template. If someone has edited the documentation then it was without consultation on the talk page. -- deflective (talk) 05:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for Comment on the Berlin page

Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Using {{Respell}}

I saw you add {{Respell}} to pages. If I may point to some details. E.g. in Suisun City, California you wrote {{respell|suh-SOON}}. But respell renders this incorrect: → suh-SOON.
The rules involved are: Rule 1. Do separate syllables with a pipe (|)), do not use hyphens (the template adds them): {{respell|suh|SOON}} Rule 2: When stress is on the final syllable, add an invisible apostrophe syllable: {{respell|suh|SOON|'}}. This produces: → suh-SOON (now correct). Note 1, the template decides which syllables to capitalise=stress, one can also write: {{respell|suh|soon|'}} → suh-soon. More on Template:Respell documentation. Note 2: when there is an error with the capital stressed syllables, the page is added to this category: Category:Articles with Respell capitalisation issues (lowercase input). -DePiep (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Disastrous use of bot

Hi Deflective. I am about to reverse your recent edit to List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations. Have you not checked through the article to see what chaos your bot has created? Your revisions to the English section may or may not be fine (I'm not sufficiently conversant with IPA to be able to judge) but the American section has been reduced to gibberish. SiGarb | (Talk) 20:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

• The reversion has now been done by another editor. SiGarb | (Talk) 21:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Parentheses

Hey, I saw you do transcriptions. Why don't you use parentheses? =) 85.56.132.94 (talk) 01:49, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I've switched to leaving off the parenthesis on single pronunciations because there are other editors who do it that way. I originally tried to standardize on using parenthesis all the time but some major editors didn't adopt it. It's more important to have a consistent format than using my energy to fight for my ideal preference. -- deflective (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages

Dear Author/Deflective

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Helicobacter Pylori. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Sarcopterygii stubs

Hi, fellow. I would like to ask you for your opinion regarding this proposal for creating a Category:Sarcopterygii stubs. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Need your help!

Sorry, since I was here anyway, no pressure, but consider, please! I thought I'd ask you to join us referencing (and many other options if you click the banner) to reduce all the half-baked articles and whatnot that currently pollute Wikipedia. My primary motive here is that you actually need your expert help with an unreferenced article, Genticorum, which I randomly chose to add some text and references. Will you take a look at the article? The trio are from Quebec and all their lyrics are in French. I obtained the basic pronunciation from the Washington Post, but I do need your help for the IPA version of the way the band name sounds. Would you please give it a try, or if you are too busy, refer it to another brilliant editor?  :) Thanks, --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

IPA edits

Edits like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wicca&diff=556925667&oldid=556862910) are highly inappropriate. You are claiming a particular change in your edit summary and making an entirely different edit. Beyond that, removing the parentheses from parenthetical information is simply damaging to the article, in that the sentence no longer makes grammatical sense. I'd strongly suggest that you restore the parentheses to the articles you've removed them from. Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I am the one who originally tried to establish parenthesized pronunciations as Wikipedia standard (as well as the speaker icon). Several major pronunciation editors did not follow suit, though. I am simply reverting my earlier edits that created the parenthesizes so that some kind of standard can be established.

Your comment about the summary is valid. This is my first time using AWB and I introduced the new edit as I went along.

--deflective (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Other IPA for Chinook wind

Please see Chinook_wind#Pronunciation_in_the_Pacific_Northwest and note the pronunciation difference; I've been of the opinion that this should be in the lede.....the Canadian Encyclopedia cite is "unreliable" (many of their articles have egregious geographic and historical errors, some of which they've fixed on my advice) and redolent with East-of-the-Rockies bias. Whatever, the IPA mentioned in that section needs templating, it's beyond me....Skookum1 (talk) 07:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

IPAc-en and commas

Commas used to delimit pronunciations in IPA-en get converted to secondary stress, like here. The comma is an alt character for 2ndary stress in {{H:IPA}}. — Lfdder (talk) 22:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. They should be split (as it is now) but I don't always catch them during the conversion process.

--deflective (talk) 22:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I'd actually like it better if we were to add a ,_ flag in {{H:IPA}} to keep everything inside a single pair of slashes. — Lfdder (talk) 22:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I generally don't make those decisions, I just try to implement what the pronunciation editors decide. If you feel strongly about it then you could try bringing it up in {{IPAc-en}}'s talk page.

--deflective (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

ipA edit at Warumpi Band

Your IPA edit produced /wəˈr[unsupported input]mpi/ at Warumpi Band -- Paul foord (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure what the pronunciation should be. It has been added to Ill-formatted IPAc-en transclusions and someone will take a closer look at it. --deflective (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all the standardization work you've been doing recently, on IPA templates. (And from a glance at various archives, thanks also for many years of work improving the templates themselves!) –Quiddity (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Quiddity. It feels good to be closing in on the end of my original conversion project. --deflective (talk) 00:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Coquihalla

Just saw this. Please note the other pronunciation, which is more KAW-ki-halla than "Coke-i-halla". Both are used, IMO the former is equally as common if not moreso. Hard to cite that, but I'm from the area; the abbreviated name "the Coke" is an influece on the increasing use of the latter; the short form of the former of course couldn't be used in polite company....Skookum1 (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

{{respell}}

I see you are introducing {{Respell}} ([2], [3]). As they were introduced, the respell is not correct wrt capitalised (stressed) syllables. Please take a look at the {{respell/doc}}: like, split into parameters (using |), group same-stress into one parameter, and count stress syllables from the end. -DePiep (talk) 10:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

IPA automated edit

Hi, Deflective. I don't know if you're aware, but some of your AWB edits (example) are making changes to pages in the user namespace. You may wish to change this, as many users use subpages of their userpage to create article drafts, and may object to other editors (automated or not) making changes to their works in progress. I'm not too bothered in this case (in fact, it was nice to be reminded of a draft I've not yet finished) but wouldn't be surprised if another editor was to take exception. Thanks, matt (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

You make a good point, I'm trying to figure out how to remove User Namespace from the list. --deflective (talk) 02:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Deflective, let me add my thanks to those above for the good work you've been doing on pronunciation templates. However I would just add to the point Mattgirling makes above, that you should probably restrict edits to those in the main article namespace, unless you're very sure what you're doing. As an example, I noticed the page Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rwanda/archive1/Original lead was changed. This page is no longer in use, so it's no big deal, but its intention was to be used as a snapshot of how a particular part of a page looked at a particular point in time. Obviously it's therefore not appropriate to change that, even if it's just to apply standardised changes.

I've used AWB quite a bit over the years, and it's a very useful tool, but a tip I'd say is just to make sure that you sanity check every edit you're making with the tool before hitting the save button. If you don't understand the purpose of a particular page, or why the text that you're editing in it is where it is, then best just to skip on to the next one. Thanks, and keep up the good work!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

This AWB run is now finished, there should be no more issues with this.

An explanation why I continued to edit all namespaces: the 'icon' flag will now be deprecated. Since it will no longer be recognized, transclusions that use it will be added to Ill-formatted IPAc-en transclusions. --deflective (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Tui: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —me_and 12:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)