You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
In order to have an article on Wikipedia a subject must meet certain inclusion criteria called notability. For footballers, there are two guidelines used to find out if they are notable or not. The general notability guideline says any subject that has received significant coverage in reliable sources is notable. It's pretty rare for this to be the case for a footballer unless they also meet the other guideline. The football-specific notability guideline says a footballer is notable if they have played for their country's senior national team or in one of the fully professional leagues listed here. Since Juric is yet to make his debut for Hajduk Split, he does not meet this guideline either. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Non-league appearances can be sufficient for notability, under two conditions: if it's a competitive fixture and both teams involved play in a fully professional league. So Jenic this would mean playing a match in the Cup against another 1. HNL club, or in one of the UEFA competitions against a club from one of the other leagues listed here. Unless Jenic's soccerway profile is out of date, that does not appear to have happened.
On a completely unrelated note, please sign your talk page comments by typing four tildes (~~~~) after them. This displays your username and a timestamp for the comment, and makes it easier to keep track of who said what. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Degenhardt1999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (media) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
I noticed you added a Division column to the "Season by season record" section of the Wanderers page. I'm not convinced that this is necessary (given the absence of promotion/relegation in the A-League), but perhaps you have a convincing argument that I've not considered?Yoka Genkaku (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Brandon Paenga-Amosa) has been reviewed![edit]
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Degenhardt1999: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elle Dawe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hey mate, I saw you made a change to the top scorers list on the Aussie clubs in the ACL. Do you have a source for it? I wanted to update it too, but didn't know where to get the info from. --SuperJew (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's better to have a centralized list sourced. So you added Jamie, but what about other players who scored? Perhaps someone who has 2 or 3 goals over the span of previous campaigns scored another in 2017? --SuperJew (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But they didn't I have checked all of the Aussie teams past and present.
An article you recently created, Harry Hoopert, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable sources, independent of the subject. (?) It doesn't appear as of yet that the subject meets either the general notability guidelines as he is not covered significantly in reliable, independent sources, or the rugby union subject notability guidelines as he has not yet played a match for the Super Rugby side. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption, and add further sources. When you feel the article meets either Wikipedia's general notability guideline or WP:NRU and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kb.au (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]
Hello, Degenhardt1999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Degenhardt1999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bendigo and District Cricket Association (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes(💬 • 📝) 21:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Erick Mombaerts, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:2018 Cambodian table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
