User talk:Demented-P

Demented-P, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Demented-P! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Dont be too sure

I would definately not object idea of reintroduction all you do is make things worst with ur irritating disagreements192.135.227.163 (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm only adhering to confirmed facts and information that has been given by the filmmakers themselves, no more no less. Whether or not you think that accurate information is irritating does not concern me.Demented-P (talk) 22:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Mandarin Can Still Be

Shane Black is full of crap on considering the ripoff Mandarin (Guy Pearce) as the MCU's version because he did not use power rings and Extremis does not make the ripoff any better than the original version. But yes, Aldrich Killian was definately the true main villain since he was the one behind all the attacks in the third film but that does not mean he was the true Mandarin, yet. Haven't you forgotten about the official Mandarin, Trevor Slattery is still alive and haven't you forgotten what he said to Stark when they first met faced to faced? If he is still alive Marvel will very much reintroduce him in the future films and reconsider him the official Mandarin and if you keep defying me, well then, you obviously don't understand much about the character at all and one good reason that Killian could certainly not be the official leader of the Ten Rings is because he is certainly not Afghanistinian.MandarinVengeance (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm only adhering to facts and information confirmed by the filmmakers. Even Kevin Fiege was aware of the radical choice being made with the Mandarin yet he still approved it. Keep in mind that the MCU is separate from the original comics, and just like other forms of adaptation, they obviously decided to change their version of the Mandarin for whatever reasons they decided. That doesn't mean that it outright replaces the comic version, because the comic Mandarin still exists, it's just that the movie version is different. Whether or not you're happy with their decision, it doesn't change the fact that Black has gone out of his way to specifically point out that Guy Pearce's character is their take on the Mandarin in the MCU. Also if you must know, Drew Pearce confirmed that Killian only appropriated the Ten Rings symbol for his personal scheme and that the fate of the actual terrorist group is rendered unknown. If a new and more faithful Mandarin comes out in a new Iron Man film, I'm more than happy to change the info depending on what the filmmakers will say about it, but as it is right now, I'm sticking with the given info that has been provided. If you feel like you must really voice out your complaints, go to Marvel and Shane Black and tell it to them, otherwise stop posting misinformation on the articles because it just disrupts the flow of editing.Demented-P (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Demented-P. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Demented-P. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Demented-P. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Demented-P. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)