User talk:Dennis Francis Blewett

Welcome

Hello, Dennis Francis Blewett, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:32, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

April 2021

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Travelling salesman problem have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:No original research. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:No original research. Unless you have a true question to ask about WP:OR, this contribution is here to solely antagonize, and I've removed it. Please stop doing so. Nate • (chatter) 21:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

• In addition to your adding and restoring disputed content and nonsense across multiple articles and talk pages, your personal attacks at User talk:Mrschimpf are completely unacceptable.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)