User talk:Depthburg

elcome to Wikipedia Depthburg, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 02:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Depthburg, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Depthburg. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 02:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Townville Elementary School shooting page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate ref definitions[edit]

Hello. You are creating duplicate ref definitions at 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. There is no reason to do this. I will revert your edits. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see you have been doing this in lots of articles. I will try to locate and revert all of what you have done so far. Please don't do any more. You are accomplishing nothing except increasing the size of the wiki code and creating duplicate entries in the References sections. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amarjeet Sada (December 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying WP:CRIME.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amarjeet Sada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm John "Hannibal" Smith. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of school shootings in the United States without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you're not sure what something is, then don't revert. You need a good reason to delete that much text. Monasteries have schools within. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 03:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thank you, that was my main doubt with the text as I didn't know monasteries could be schools.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Nicole Madison Lovell (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

The subject of this article is a non notable event. See WP:EVENTCRIT. Crimes are presumed not notable unless you can show both widespread and enduring coverage and a longterm and widespread effect. Sadly, people get murdered every day. Unless this tragedy changed something that effects a wide population, it isn't notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murder of Nicole Madison Lovell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 22:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I've deleted your Draft, but under G7 (one author request) rather than A7 (db-person). The A class criteria only apply in article space, and not in user space or Draft: space. Your draft looked quite well constructed, and if the notability level rises, just ask me to restore it. Peridon (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I won't be asking anytime soon. Depthburg (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolgrad palace bombing has been accepted[edit]

Bolgrad palace bombing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 BPM Music Festival shooting (January 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still questionable for WP:EVENT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Onision[edit]

Articles in general and Biographies of living persons in particular should be based on reliable sources. Citing youtube videos from Onision himself is using WP:Primary sources, which is generally a bad idea, but more so in the case f a YouTuber not renowned for hislove of the Truth in all its majestic glory. Kleuske (talk) 12:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. Depthburg (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Depthburg. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Southern California Edison shooting[edit]

Hello, I have a question about the motive for this shooting. It involves SOX. I am having an issue and think you could help me resolve it. Also let me know if we could speak over the phone it would be good. Thank you! lohmeyel Lohmeyel (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, unfortunately we can't talk on the phone but I'd like to clarify with you the motive. Andre Turner had a civil lawsuit on his hands (a lawsuit that involves contracts and stuff) and he was being sued. He was also reprimanded by his boss for a Sarbanes Oxley Audit finding which sounds super complex to debunk. But that is the simplified overview. I'm sorry if it sounds like I repeated the Wikipedia article (his motives are very complex!), check articles on it. Depthburg (talk) 10:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for responding. There is reason to believe that some SCE managers use SOX against employees that question managers or that they blame employees for SOX violations that they themselves have committed. I would like to know if this was the case with Andre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lohmeyel (talk • contribs) 14:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andre was accused by his boss according to Los Angeles Times. Depthburg (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Depthburg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017 BPM Music Festival shooting[edit]

Hello, Depthburg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017 BPM Music Festival shooting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]