User talk:Desade 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


September 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Fox Lover has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Fox Lover was changed by Desade 4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86666 on 2016-09-18T10:48:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Fox Lover. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 22:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw your post on the help desk about the problems you have been having editing The Fox Lover. While DemocraticLuntz was wrong to term your well-intentioned edits vandalism, they certianly are not the best way to improve that article.

Currently, that article has a brief intro stating that The Fox Lover is a Chinese film, and who stars in it. It then launches into a 4-paragraph plot summary that feels long and somewhat confusing to someone who has not seen the film (and that's without your additions!). After the plot summary there's a list of cast and the article ends.

The article provides no context for why the film was made, what impact the film had on society, how the film impacted the careers of the actors, how the film was recieved by critics or performed in the box office, or whether the film won awards or not, all things one should expect in an encyclopedia article about the film. Compare for example some featured articles (featured articles are considered to be Wikipedia's best work) about films such as Mom and Dad, Djaoeh Dimata, or pretty much any article in Category:FA-Class film articles. Djaoeh Dimata has only a very brief one paragraph plot summary, devoting nearly the entire article to discussing the film's importance in post-war Indonesia, and its effect on the careers of the actors.

Rather than crafting a play-by-play, scene-by-scene retelling of the entire movie, you would be better advised to attempt to summarize the plot in a single paragraph, and then write about why the film is important; how it was received both in China and internationally, whether this was a make or break moment in the careers of the actors and directors and producers, etc.

I hope this advice is helpful to you. You might also want to take a look at WP:NOTPLOT and MOS:PLOT, two pages which provide guidance on how to write plot summaries in Wikipedia.

Lastly, I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia, as it seems no one has yet done that. I hope this rocky start doesn't discourage you from participating. Below this is a standard welcome message with a LOT more really useful links. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 21:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Desade 4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 21:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]