User talk:Devildriver fan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Devildriver fan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mr. Darcy talk 04:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your user page[edit]

Hi. I've deleted your userpage because it contained some pretty nasty comments about a real person. If you want to re-create it, please do so without making disparaging remarks about other people or about other Wikipedia editors. Let me know if you have any questions. | Mr. Darcy talk 04:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lou 'Baulder' Richards[edit]

The article Lou 'Baulder' Richards has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 03:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Brokeback Mountain page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. eaolson 01:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


System of a Down[edit]

If you didn't see the hidden comment, you HAVE to discuss it on the talk page before changing a genre. It can be considered vandalism if you continue to edit it without discussing and coming to a conclusion that "hard rock" should be added. Please refrain from adding it again, thank you. Bsroiaadn 01:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Aguilara[edit]

How did you find out Dave got hurt in the accident? We need more precise information on the accident, when, where, and how?  immunity  talk  01:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...taking from my talk page...
Bleed The Dream has sent messages to all friends in myspace that confirmed that Dave had an accident while riding his bike.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devildriver fan (talkcontribs)
So I know this, but if you are going to edit and create an article for him, you need to cite correctly this information. I am not going to do it for you. I will have nothing to do with Dave, I cannot be biased.  immunity  talk  22:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dead Hearts[edit]

An editor has nominated Dead Hearts, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Hearts and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hourcast-stateofdisgrace.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hourcast-stateofdisgrace.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:PatrickMcBride.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PatrickMcBride.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bitter Verses[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bitter Verses, by Leuko (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bitter Verses seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bitter Verses, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Bitter Verses itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roses Are Red (band)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roses Are Red (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Levine2112 discuss 18:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hourcast[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hourcast, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

reason - No reliable sources given, none found via Google search, only one album listed.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The article State of Disgrace‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZODtheReaper (talkcontribs) 07:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roses Are Red (band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roses Are Red (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roses Are Red (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]