User talk:Devilfan30
Welcome[edit]
Hello Devilfan30 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Brady Hoke, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dawn Bard (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
June 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hillary Clinton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Even if you undo said edits (which you did), that is completely unacceptable. —MelbourneStar☆talk 05:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Your addition to Paul Manafort has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆talk 06:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Please explain these edits[edit]
--Guy Macon (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
Your recent editing history at Melania Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
August 2016[edit]
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Barack Obama, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —MelbourneStar☆talk 13:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fuzheado | Talk 09:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ThT (talk) 10:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Devilfan30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was told by MelbourneStar that I would receive a warning
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Devilfan30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I know and MelbourneStar said it would be my final warning. I promise I won't do this again. thanks
Decline reason:
Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in your case. PhilKnight (talk) 01:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To reviewing admin[edit]
After this user had received four separate warnings, they added this garbage: [5]. That the user thinks that sort of thing is appropriate right up until they've received more than four warnings is shocking and disgusting. --Yamla (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)