User talk:Dgtsyb/Archives/2011/07
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I did not follow your revert reasoning. You now claim that the software synchronization concept is more relevant, and that no multiplexing was done? Boy am I confused. Please provide sources. More on talk page. W Nowicki (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
SUA
Hello. In this edit to Signalling Connection Control Part you added back a link to SUA with the comment "SUA is a different article." Well, no, actually it isn't an article at all; it is a disambiguation page. What information is on that disambiguation page that might possibly be relevant to a reader of the Signalling Connection Control Part article, other than the link that takes them right back to the original article? You might want to consider undoing this edit. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)