User talk:Dianaareginaa

October 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall was changed by Dianaareginaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960521 on 2021-10-17T18:55:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, you may be blocked from editing. Uranium Site (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dianaareginaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Distinguished Administrator, I'm writing to appeal a block on my account dating from 2021. When I was younger, I vandalised the Wikipedia page of Her Majesty Queen Camilla, and amended her name to a cruel nickname that is commonly used to mock her in the British press. At the time, I thought this was funny and would do no harm, but now that I am older, I can see that not only is this not at all acceptable for the following reasons: - It is very harmful as it demeans another person whom I have never met and thus have no right to pass any judgement on, - It harms the Wikipedia community as vandalising articles defames the image of Wikipedia and, ultimately can put people off availing of an extremely valuable resource, without which many people would not have access to free, unbiased information about a vast array of topics. Since my vandalism of the article, I have taken the time to research and educate myself regarding the life and work of The Queen, and have come to deeply admire and respect Her Majesty for her activism surrounding Violence against Women and Girls. While I may personally oppose the system of monarchy, I accept that defaming a person and vandalising a public resource is not the correct forum to make my voice heard. I sincerely regret my actions and understand now, through 3 years of personal growth, that what I did was wrong and an abuse of my privellige to edit Wikipedia articles. I understand and accept fully the consequences of my actions and would understand entirely if my appeal was rejected. Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope this has found you safe and well. Dianaareginaa (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Distinguished Administrator, I'm writing to appeal a block on my account dating from 2021. When I was younger, I vandalised the Wikipedia page of Her Majesty Queen Camilla, and amended her name to a cruel nickname that is commonly used to mock her in the British press. At the time, I thought this was funny and would do no harm, but now that I am older, I can see that not only is this not at all acceptable for the following reasons: - It is very harmful as it demeans another person whom I have never met and thus have no right to pass any judgement on, - It harms the Wikipedia community as vandalising articles defames the image of Wikipedia and, ultimately can put people off availing of an extremely valuable resource, without which many people would not have access to free, unbiased information about a vast array of topics. Since my vandalism of the article, I have taken the time to research and educate myself regarding the life and work of The Queen, and have come to deeply admire and respect Her Majesty for her activism surrounding Violence against Women and Girls. While I may personally oppose the system of monarchy, I accept that defaming a person and vandalising a public resource is not the correct forum to make my voice heard. I sincerely regret my actions and understand now, through 3 years of personal growth, that what I did was wrong and an abuse of my privellige to edit Wikipedia articles. I understand and accept fully the consequences of my actions and would understand entirely if my appeal was rejected. Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope this has found you safe and well.  [[User:Dianaareginaa|Dianaareginaa]] ([[User talk:Dianaareginaa#top|talk]]) 23:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Distinguished Administrator, I'm writing to appeal a block on my account dating from 2021. When I was younger, I vandalised the Wikipedia page of Her Majesty Queen Camilla, and amended her name to a cruel nickname that is commonly used to mock her in the British press. At the time, I thought this was funny and would do no harm, but now that I am older, I can see that not only is this not at all acceptable for the following reasons: - It is very harmful as it demeans another person whom I have never met and thus have no right to pass any judgement on, - It harms the Wikipedia community as vandalising articles defames the image of Wikipedia and, ultimately can put people off availing of an extremely valuable resource, without which many people would not have access to free, unbiased information about a vast array of topics. Since my vandalism of the article, I have taken the time to research and educate myself regarding the life and work of The Queen, and have come to deeply admire and respect Her Majesty for her activism surrounding Violence against Women and Girls. While I may personally oppose the system of monarchy, I accept that defaming a person and vandalising a public resource is not the correct forum to make my voice heard. I sincerely regret my actions and understand now, through 3 years of personal growth, that what I did was wrong and an abuse of my privellige to edit Wikipedia articles. I understand and accept fully the consequences of my actions and would understand entirely if my appeal was rejected. Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope this has found you safe and well.  [[User:Dianaareginaa|Dianaareginaa]] ([[User talk:Dianaareginaa#top|talk]]) 23:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Distinguished Administrator, I'm writing to appeal a block on my account dating from 2021. When I was younger, I vandalised the Wikipedia page of Her Majesty Queen Camilla, and amended her name to a cruel nickname that is commonly used to mock her in the British press. At the time, I thought this was funny and would do no harm, but now that I am older, I can see that not only is this not at all acceptable for the following reasons: - It is very harmful as it demeans another person whom I have never met and thus have no right to pass any judgement on, - It harms the Wikipedia community as vandalising articles defames the image of Wikipedia and, ultimately can put people off availing of an extremely valuable resource, without which many people would not have access to free, unbiased information about a vast array of topics. Since my vandalism of the article, I have taken the time to research and educate myself regarding the life and work of The Queen, and have come to deeply admire and respect Her Majesty for her activism surrounding Violence against Women and Girls. While I may personally oppose the system of monarchy, I accept that defaming a person and vandalising a public resource is not the correct forum to make my voice heard. I sincerely regret my actions and understand now, through 3 years of personal growth, that what I did was wrong and an abuse of my privellige to edit Wikipedia articles. I understand and accept fully the consequences of my actions and would understand entirely if my appeal was rejected. Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope this has found you safe and well.  [[User:Dianaareginaa|Dianaareginaa]] ([[User talk:Dianaareginaa#top|talk]]) 23:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

What edits do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that I necesarrily want to make edits, it just that I'd like the option to make them if I felt that an article could be improved. Thanks :) Dianaareginaa (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No checkuser evidence of block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to remove the block if you have no edits you want to make, as blocks only prevent editing. To remove the block, there needs to be some benefit to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for getting back to me - I believe there could be a benefit to Wikipedia. If I see something that could be improved, I would have the option to improve it, if something wasn't accurate or could be added to. Additionally, there are a number of topics that I am knowledgable about that have pages/articles that are a work in progress or don't have articles, I believe I could provide useful knowledge to these articles, thus benefiting the readers. I do hope this clears up my intentions, and I do understand and will respect whatever outcome you see fit. Be well! Dianaareginaa (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]