User talk:DidiWeidmann/Archive2010-11-08

Go back to the user talk of DidiWeidmann

Welcome[edit]

Hi DidiWeidmann, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your hallo and welcome! DidiWeidmann (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muetersprach[edit]

Gruezi! Bisch nei hier, gell? Dia G'schicht mit dem ISO-Code als, der fir'd Albaner reserviert worda isch, hemmer scho em Sommer ond em Herbscht durchkaue missa. Scheener Scheissdreck, dees. I woiß au net was mir do no macha ko, I glaub es hend älle uffgeba.-- Matthead DisOuß 20:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi - I han inzwüschä ä Lösig gfundä: s'Problem liit dadrin, dass d'iso vo Englisch-sprachigä Lüüt dominiert wird und mir Alemanne da halt nu schlächt, das häisst diskriminärt mitredä chönnd. Ich glaubä di äinzig Lösig liit da drin, dass mär dä gliich Babälbaustäi boät wiä i dä alemannischä Wiki, nämli mit gsw! - Ich wird mär dänn nach Rücksprach mit äm "schuldigä" Admi, d'Freihäit usänee, d'ALS-Nutzär-Kategorie namal für ä paar Minutä z reaktiviärä, damit i alli oisi Mitstritär findä cha und ine dä Babelbaustäi ändärä (wenn's vil sind mitämänä Robotär und susch vo Händschä ...) - Gruäss DidiWeidmann (talk) 01:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Didi, han jetzt gad na churz uf de Babel-talk-Siitte min Säich dezue ggee. Chäibe Säich, dass s'äim da äifach t'Kategorii lösched. Wa mäinsch, gäächti das ächt, dasmer würded en noji Kategorii iifüere, wos bisane im ISO halt nöd git, won aber ali alemanische Dialäkt würd zämefasse (öppe so wis tag "ger" für Tüütsch als Oberbegriff)? Ich han käi Aanig, weli Adminischtratoore da s'Säge händ, aber grundsätzlich müesti das doch möglich sii, dasmer es nois tag für z'ganzi Alemanisch iifüered, nöd nume füs Schwiizertüütsch eläi. (Mer wend da ja nöd as Schwiizer di transrhenane ;-) Alemane gnääueso diskriminiere wi di änglischi Wiki ois.) Du känsch di da aber gläps besser uus weniich... Trigaranus (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En Wikipedia_talk:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive_5#Category:User_als_and_subcats isch des ganze Elend scho broidtreta worda. Dees Problem isch dass SIL International, "a faith-based linguistic services organization which studies lesser-known languages" (also an Verein der Sprocha studiert bloß om die Christlich Lehr ond Bibel onder de Negr ond Eskimo zom verbreita), sein Senf em Ethnologue ausbreitet, ond die ISO des oifach ibernemmt was dia Betbrüder do aushecke. Dia sen total inkompetent, Amerikaner halt. Oi Prinzip von dene isch, daß an Code der wo oimol verwendet worde isch, nie meh für ebbes anders verwendet werda derf. Die sen so ofehlbar wia dr Papst. -- Matthead DisOuß 05:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A little bit more neutrality, please! Don't mix your opinions on Christian mission and so on with the discussions about ISO codes and language variants. Hellsepp 21:39, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

May I create an article on you?[edit]

Hello, DidiWeidmann! I have noticed that your user page has been added to the Category:Swiss Esperantists. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that this category is for articles only, not user pages. You seem to be a highly proficient Esperantist, and as such, I think that maybe we should have an article about you and add it to said category. Please let me know what you think of the idea. I am more than willing to write an article about you based on your user page if you believe it to be appropriate, but please correct me if you feel that I am out of line on anything that I have said. I am just trying to help improve Wikipedia one small step at a time. TFCforever (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I have nothing against but my position on this subject is neutral. In the Esperanto Movement I am actually Co-President of the Swiss Esperanto-Society and was General Secretary of the World Esperanto Youth Organization from 1987 to 1990, so you have to decide if that is relevant enough for an article. In any case every contribution to Wikipedia which is based on correct fakcts is a good action. - As my English is only of secondary level my I have to do my main contributions to Wikipedia in the Esperanto (in which I am a Sysop), German and Alemanic versions. Greatings DidiWeidmann (talk) 23:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La fokuso de miaj vikipediistaj aktivecoj koncentriĝas al la Esperanto-Vikipedio. Diskutkontribuoj tial estas responditaj pli rapide sur mia tiea diskutpaĝo. DidiWeidmann

eo:Vikipediista diskuto:DidiWeidmann als:Benutzer Diskussion:DidiWeidmann de:Benutzer Diskussion:DidiWeidmann fr:Discussion Utilisateur:DidiWeidmann it:Discussioni utente:DidiWeidmann pt:Usuário Discussão:DidiWeidmann

Blocked[edit]

{{tlx|unblock|1=[[User:Tiptoety]] blockec my acount by arbitrary act. I was always a serious contributor of allo Wikipedia projects. Without any reason [[User:Tiptoety]] blocked my account arbitrarily. I am a Sysop of the Esperanto-Wikipedia and I did never any thing in the English Wikipedia which would justify blocking my account. Tiptoety accused my to have multiple accounts, what is a big lie! did If this is a mistake please undo and apologize. If it is intention please take away from Tiptoety his administrator rights!! [[User:DidiWeidmann|DidiWeidmann]] ([[User talk:DidiWeidmann#top|talk]]) 20:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)}} I am an admin in the process of reviewing this. Do not undo my edits, please. Unblock requests belong at the bottom of the page. Sandstein 21:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer's comment: A checkuser has determined, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xtinadbest, that you have abused multiple accounts. Merely asserting that this is "a big lie" does not convince me that said checkuser assessment is wrong. As such, I would normally decline this request. But your contributions are so unlike those of the other sock accounts that I am prepared to believe that this may be a mistake. Please stand by while I ask the checkuser to double-check. Sandstein 21:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help my!! DidiWeidmann is of course no sockpuppet but my real name. I am an administrator of the Esperanto-Wikipedia and wrote there more than 1000 non-stub articles. On commons I uploaded more than 2000 pictures. You can veryfy that easily. DidiWeidmann (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to unblock right now, but I will ask about one thing. I note that you state that you have four daughters. Is one of them highly interested in the Eurovision Song Contest? Specifically Junior Eurovision?—Kww(talk) 21:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of my daughters could by intrested in the Eurovision Contest (even if I do not understand the relation to the block of my account), as she now visites the theatre school comaart at Zurich and also sings at the Zurich Opera. She also wrote already several songs. DidiWeidmann (talk) 22:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mean a daughter that could be using the same computer as you.—Kww(talk) 22:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non of my daughters uses the same computer as I do. They have both their own computer - which have acces to Internet through tha same network than I. Also I think as my daughters speak German and only very few English they would never enter make any edits on the English Wiki. We have internet access through cable com with variable IP-address i.e. that many people here in Uster or around Uster could have an IP address in a similar range (if wikipedia blocks tha cable com IP-address range in the Uster Zürich area, that would block thousands of people!!! DidiWeidmann (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People are still considering this. It's probably going to require a second checkuser to review the results, so it will take time. The match that has been reported is on the exact IP you use. Don't worry that anyone is blocking all of Zurich.—Kww(talk) 22:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I heard, that it is tecnically possible to falsify IP-adresses! - You can have a look on all my edits and you will clearly see that I never vandalized Wiki why should I? I am my self an administrator on the Esperanto-Wikipedia. So please unblock my account. There is no reason that I should vandalize Wiki. Dietrich Weidmann (DidiWeidmann) is my real name, so I am not an anonymous user. You can also check my contributions on the Esperanto-Vikipedia that should be reference enough to prove that I never would do anything negative against Wikipedia. - And to make clear: We get our IP-address aribrally by cablecom. This address changes from time to time at the moment we make a new loggin. DidiWeidmann (talk) 22:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

←My reply can be found here. Tiptoety ^talk 02:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per blocking admins comment above, he seems to concur that this was a false-positive. Please accept our apologies over this misunderstanding. --Jayron32 07:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Jayron32

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thank you for the unblocking. - I felt very terrible for the blocking an even more for the accuse on my personal User page that I am a sockpuppet of any vandal. So I am very happy for the unblock. I can only assert that I had nothing todo with this valdal. It may be possible that 3rd persons could get access to our WIFI - if this is the case this must be a person in our next neighbourhoud. If this is the case I shall earlier or later find this person. In any case I shall also consult a specialist to find any security problems in my WIFI and close the eventual gaps.DidiWeidmann (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

← Additionally, if you like, you can remove the block template along with this thread from your talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 17:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to the user talk of DidiWeidmann