User talk:Digitalageohio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Digitalageohio! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ajura has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BostonMensa (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Ajura is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Information icon Hi Digitalageohio! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Plateau State that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restlezz moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Restlezz. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it's unreliably sourced. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day User:I dream of horses hope you having a blessed day the article you sent to draft space has been corrected and written correctly all Citations and references meet with wikipedia standards as stated in:
  • WP:A/S and
    • WP:EMU it is now ready for live space thank you for your contributions to the community you are doing a great Job
Digitalageohio (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Restlezz (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (This Article should not be deleted because it meets the Standards on Wikipedia guidelines on notability from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:GNG&redirect=no Reliable Sources, the citations used in the Subject Article are from reliable sources, The Source, All Hiphop Earmilk, Guardian, and Tribune Online these are reliable sources as said in https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronic_music/Sources )
Significant Coverage The subject has had significant coverage you can look over the citations he was on an interview with Earmilk a Reliable trusted source for Wikipedia on music-related subjects.
Reliable Wikipedia already listed these sources as reliable so the citations from these sources were used in the article.
Sources and it's not from a single source it's from multiple sources, not just one and they all meet Wikipedia standards for neutrality and reliability.
Independent of the subject The sources used for citations are independent of the subject as you can use they are from Major Newspapers publication that can't sell their reputation because of a subject.
As you can see the Subject Restlezz meets all the standards for Wikipedia neutrality and notability as stated in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline
Talking About Notability the subject has a Knowledge Panel Generated by Google Knowledge Panels cant be bought or created it's autogenerated when an entity is a public figure that is well known.
Thanks for your help in helping the community grow its in your hands now I hope you consider my petition and see the reasons why the subject article should not be deleted. Digitalageohio (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Queen Iden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.edoworld.net/Queen_Iden_Benin.html, https://guardian.ng/sunday-magazine/queen-iden-selfless-intercessor/, and https://artsandculture.google.com/story/remarkable-historical-figures-of-ancient-benin-kingdom/fwXBiUQgLcccIw. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 01:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Digitalageohio! Your additions to Queen Iden have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Digitalageohio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.89.42.73. Place any further information here. Digitalageohio (talk) 21:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed P2P proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 22:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Favi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Favi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Favi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

{{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.89.40.149. Place any further information here. No VPN was used I just logged in my account and I got that message. }} Digitalageohio (talk) 06:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI: you're not blocked. Kleuske (talk) 13:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stainless (singer) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Stainless (singer). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 05:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stainless (singer) (July 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 15:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Digitalageohio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 15:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on DennyB[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page DennyB, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Favi (musician) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Favi (musician). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 19:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Restlezz (musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Restlezz (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restlezz (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DennyB for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DennyB is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DennyB until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Hard work pays Searchalphahorse (talk) 07:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
point noted thank you Searchalphahorse (talk) 07:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 11:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Digitalageohio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear @Girth Summit

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the indefinite block placed on my Wikipedia account due to concerns over abusive usage. I deeply value Wikipedia as a platform for sharing knowledge and fostering a collaborative environment, and I assure you that my intention has always been aligned with these principles.
I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and quality of content on Wikipedia, and I am committed to upholding these standards. I believe that the block on my account may have been a result of a misunderstanding or unintended actions, and I sincerely apologize if my contributions were perceived otherwise.
I am fully dedicated to following Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, and I am committed to using my account responsibly for constructive contributions. I am eager to rectify any misunderstandings and resume my contributions to Wikipedia's mission of sharing accurate and reliable information with the world.
If there were any specific actions or contributions that triggered this block, I am more than willing to address them and take appropriate steps to rectify the situation. I genuinely value the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia and the opportunity it provides to contribute to a global pool of knowledge.
I kindly request your understanding and consideration in reviewing the block on my account. I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and contributing positively to the platform. Your assistance in reinstating my account would be greatly appreciated, and I look forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia's valuable work. i joined the wikibiography project and wikibiography project for Africa and Nigeria so i could bring up hidden history for the wiki space i had no idea of the rules to follow on afds that is why my comments seemed abusive but honestly i showed proof how it met wikipedia guidelines and standards i hope to do better now that this blocked has helped me learnt.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I am available to provide any necessary information or clarification as needed. I appreciate your consideration and hope for a positive resolution. Digitalageohio (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am summarily declining this request because it was(except for the last sentence) clearly written by an AI. You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write your request in your own words. 331dot (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed this template for you, so that other administrators can see it and review it. I will observe that it does not address the reason for your block, which is my belief that you are evading a block placed on the account Oneboygreen. Girth Summit (blether) 14:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Digitalageohio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good Day @331dot and @Girth Summit am not going to lie or deny Creating another wikipedia account which i did i did that because i had some issues uploading on commons so i did not have any other alternative than to create another account to upload the files on there sir / ma if you investigate this you would find out that i have never used the wikipedia account to create an article or even edit one wikipedia community has been such an helpful community am able to create articles on forgotten history like General Ologbosere with all due respect sir / ma i never involved my wikipedia account i created on the side which is @Searchalphahorse on the Afd discussion which might have led to my block i did not do it sir or ma so sir / ma according to using any of my accounts abusively i never used both of them to seek positions for each other i never used the other to promote the other or to get revenge on a delete or article you know that you can see everything done on my account so i urge you kindly go through all this and give me a chance i promise you will not regret it thank you. Digitalageohio (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing as unresponsive. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you use one of your accounts to send talk page messages to another of your accounts? You need to explain that, because there is a danger that it may bee thought that you were trying to give the impression of being two different people in preparation for dishonest use of a sockpuppet in the future. JBW (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stainless (singer)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Digitalageohio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stainless (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stainless (singer)[edit]

Hello, Digitalageohio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stainless".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]