User talk:DistopiaNight

Have some free time, so will aim to fix some articles

Centra Tech moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Centra Tech, is not yet ready for publication. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Centra Tech has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Centra Tech. Thanks! GMG^talk 12:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centra Tech has been accepted

Centra Tech, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

now, i have accepted it, as it meet criteria, but there's gotta be more to say about it. be a good thing to work on expanding the article. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Logtrust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logtrust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logtrust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 14:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centra Tech

The article Centra Tech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS this token (now defunct) shouldn't be covered, since it is, and can only be interesting for its single appearance in news stories. Only notable source is the NYTimes which researched and covered this event. While well-researched, it does still not warrant an article, because it is just a single event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Centra Tech for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centra Tech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centra Tech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 01:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)