User talk:Divineabraham

Welcome!

Hello, Divineabraham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CHANDY 11'S BIRKENHEAD, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NortyNort (Holla) 09:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CHANDY 11'S BIRKENHEAD[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NortyNort (Holla) 09:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CHANDY 11'S BIRKENHEAD[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CHANDY 11'S BIRKENHEAD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have abused the multiple account's but will you please forgive me, i won't do it again please1 please! please! i beg you. sir please help me i don't want to be block for a month! Please try to help me and our wikipedia please and i hate to be idle i want to help wikipedia grow please help me dear admins. i cant even write to any admin's because i'm blocked i would like to apologize for my fault please consider me as a very nice guy again

Decline reason:

There's not a single mainspace contribution that's been retained from any of the dozen or so accounts you've created. I don't see how unblocking this one will help Wikipedia in any way. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment

Your contrition is of very recent origin. Only a few minutes ago, in this unblock request from your IP you feigned innocence. Favonian (talk) 15:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note to the reviewing admin: this account was created yesterday in an attempt to evade the block. TN X Man 15:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And to Divineabraham: if you refactor other editors' comments, like you did here, your talk page access will be revoked. Favonian (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked[edit]

Since you insist, I have revoked your talk page access. Favonian (talk) 15:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Per the more extended comment at User talk:Njavallil, I've disabled that page and renabled this one. But unless you REALLY reflect a moment AND read the guide to appealing blocks, it'll be in vain. And don't think about abusing this talk page or it will be revoked again. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again,
I'm Divine Abraham, the master account of;

The puppets mentioned in my case that actually aren't mine are;

I shouldn't have made so many accounts, I'm sorry. I'm not a harm to Wikipedia If you look at the contributions that I made using Njavallil you can see My design for main page or My contributions and understand that I have made many nice contributions. I'm sorry. I will continue to contribute to Wikipedia, but I'm blocked now so I can't edit. Can anyone please unblock me? Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 11:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can only repeat the precious comment from jpgordon; none of your contributions, including those created as Njavallil have been thought worthy of retention in the encyclopedia. And you show no evidence of understanding of the problems that sockpuppetry can cause. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said sorry, believing that you have forgiven. Now If i'm blocked does that mean I can never edit wikipedia??? (Oh! no!!!!!) So If i'm block when will I be able to edit in wikipedia? Can I edit in wikipedia. Will I ever be unblocked? Can you unblock me? I have said sorry many times (2 times) but you haven't yet forgiven Please do unblock me. I don't wannna be like this!!!! Please Unblcok me. I can't be like this. Will I ever be unblock if you don't unblock me now? Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 21:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Tikiwont's comments below. I do not feel that unblocking you would be beneficial to the project, given both the sockpuppetry and the lack of useful edits from any of your accounts. I would suggest coming back in the future and trying to meet the conditions of WP:OFFER. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry to see you in distress, but this isn't about forgiveness or redemption, but about trying to assess whether you my still create further disruption. Nevertheless, yours is a fair question. What you need to do now is refrain from creating other accounts for a long time, best a year, invest your time elsewhere, best into school, For a background read WP:OFFER. Let me repeat, the most important thing is to prove that you can refrain from creating socks whilst blocked. So you cannot edit now. But people will possibly later give you another chance, especially if you return more mature and with some clear ideas what you want to contribute. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, thank you Tikiwont for your continuous support, I'm sorry to replay after a long time, but thanks for your supports. * Second, I feel like I have matured very much that I could start working in Wikipedia again. I know that my contributions couldn't even be classified as good, that was my past. But can't Wikipedia give me another chance? Wikipedia can be edited by anyone as long as he is doing something good for the community. I feel like I have aims to develop Wikipedia's coverage in south India. I can also edit for the Local community of Liverpool, because I live here. I also work in Malayalam Wikipedia. I can promise Wikipedia that I can expand Palai, Anthiyalam, Ramapuram, Kottayam, St Alphonsa, Birkenhead and plenty more. So please do give me another chance. I will show Wikipedia that I can be a good guy (like a saint). I wasted my privileges in Wikipedia, I'm sorry about that past life of mine, now I promise that I'm back with good intentions for a better Wikipedia. Please take my words seriously. You have my word that I will never ever vandalize Wikipedia, sorry if I have. I have the maturity now. Could it be at least my last chance, if I ever Vandalize Wikipedia again you can ban me for ever. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 20:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:OFFER was extended barely a month ago. In 5 more months, please return - at that time you will need to show us the positive contributions you have made on another Wikimedia project since Dec 6, 2011. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

		The Special Barnstar
		I award this to you Tikiwont as a thank you for helping me out.Please do continue your support. (as I can't edit, could anyone please notify Tikiwont as I can't tell him about the special award, please.) Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 20:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Block[edit]

Thank you very much for your positive comments. Ms BWilkins. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈

Please help[edit]

Thank you very much for your positive comments. Ms Bwilkins. But why can't just unblock me? My Contributions are here please visit there, please unblock me. I have made very good contributions. I still want to edit in English Wikipedia because I love it so much. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈

But why can't just unblock me? He explained that to you in his decline of your unblock request. The first condition of WP:OFFER is that you wait at least six months since your last sockpuppetry - you have only waited a little over a month - before requesting to be unblocked. Rather than being impatient with the process, by instead following the conditions and instructions of the offer, you have an opportunity to demonstrate maturity to the community. —DoRD (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going for a Clean start under a new name, Chammanthy.[edit]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of 19:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC).

Clean start under a new name is required for me, so I here by submit my retirement. My new Username will be Chammanthy. Please don't block Chammanthy, unless I return to old topic areas, editing patterns, or behavior previously identified as problematic, I should be and will be careful not to do anything that looks like an attempt to evade scrutiny. As soon as I'm unblocked on 2nd February, I will be back, not like the previous one. Thank you for everything. My hearty thanks to Tikiwont for his supports. These are my contributions at Malayalam Wikipedia. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 19:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The new account has been blocked. You do not meet the requirements for a clean start: "A clean start is permitted only if there are no active bans, blocks, or sanctions in place against the old account." Other editors have repeatedly told you that your only chance lies in WP:OFFER. This means that we will not hear another peep from you the next six months. Is this clear? Favonian (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clean start.[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please notify User:Favonian about this.;[edit]

I was intending to start using my account after my block, if I'm blocked I won't edit, When I'm unblocked can I have a Clean start under a new name?

Favonian you have mentioned on chammanthy's userpage that he is a suspected sock puppet but I confirm that it's my alternate account, which I was going to use as a Clean start, if you haven't blocked it. Now can you unblock it? Because after the unblock I'm going to use it. Favonian tagged chammanthy's userpage as suspected but hasn't mentioned on my case page. 20:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'll happily change the tag to confirmed. Now stop playing games and go away from Wikipedia for six months. The conditions for your return can be negotiated then, but if you make any more attempts to test the limits, you risk a ban. Favonian (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't answered me, can I make a fresh start after my Block period? And don't ban me because I'm scared of banning policy. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 20:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I repeat: conditions for your return may be negotiated in six months. At that time, you may try, though you had better remember to notify ArbCom. Favonian (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you. But remember this you are Indeed cleverer than me. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 21:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I use User:Chammanthy after 6 months?

For the last time: no negotiations until six months from now! If you persist, I'll revoke your talk page access for the duration. Favonian (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that I deserve to be unblocked, its been more than 6 months. I think I have gained some maturity as well. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 10:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block was the result of a sockpuppet investigation, so it would be inappropriate for any individual administrator to unblock you unilaterally. In order to treat your request fairly, I'm going to ask the community for input at WP:AN; if consensus favor your unblocking, you'll be unblocked. Nyttend (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By the way, it's normal to permit the blocked person to participate in the unblock discussion. I'd like to invite you to participate like most people do: if you have something that you'd like to contribute to the unblock discussion, place the {{helpme}} template at the top of a new section, write "Please copy this to the 'Divineabraham' section of WP:AN", and then write the text you'd like to have copied. Nyttend (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request again[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Divineabraham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's nearly 8 months after my block, don't you think I have gained atleast a little more maturity? The community might think that there is no point in unblocking me because I don't have a clean background. But everyone deserves a second chance. I swear to god from now on I will be an excellent contributor. Give me a second chance as Favonian promised. Could the reviewing administrator remind Favonian about his offer. Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 11:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were just socking yesterday, and you broke WP:OFFER with socking here also. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 21:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will, as requested, notify Favonian of your request; he may already have seen it. I make no other committment. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser comment: It appears that you were trying to evade your block with this account, ചാണ്ടി (talk · contribs). I think this deserves a good explanation. As I have already declined one of your unblock request, I am not going to review this one. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make you an offer; I wrote that you would need to abstain from socking and ill-considered unblock requests for at least six months before you could hope to be eligible for WP:OFFER. As Elockid has demonstrated, you are incapable of following these simple instructions, and a remark like "don't you think I have gained atleast a little more maturity?" hardly supports the point you are trying to make. As things stand, I can't support unblocking, but as I have blocked several of your socks and made my opinion of your qualities as an editor pretty clear, I'll leave the final call to an uninvolved admin. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I made a mistake again, Elockid ^(Talk) is correct. I made a huge mistake, ചാണ്ടി (talk · contribs) is my new sock. I'm officially apologising for my mistake. Now its all upon the admin, you can unblock me if you think I deserve it but on the other hand I agree with Favonian (talk · contribs). Dr.Pilot,Divine ✈ 20:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have now revoked your talkpage due to inappropriate use. If you wish to appeal, you can file an appeal or contact arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 12:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]