User talk:Diwakar Rai Bhuinhar brahmin

June 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kanyakubja Brahmins has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kanyakubja Brahmins was changed by Diwakar Rai Bhuinhar brahmin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894124 on 2015-06-02T12:39:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kanyakubja Brahmins with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jujhautiya Brahmin. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Kanyakubja Brahmins[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have posted content to the Kanyakubja Brahmins article in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 13:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Diwakar, please use the article talk page to discuss your proposed edits to Kanyakubja Brahmins and cite sources to support your proposals. Also take a look at the various notes and warnings listed above on your talkpage, since currently your editing is falling afoul of many wikipedia policies and continuing in this vein may lead to your being blocked frm editing. Abecedare (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism, as you did at Kanyakubja Brahmins. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]