User talk:Djkeddie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There was a Saint Roch church in LaSalle Illinois and it should be added to the list of churches in the US

Your submission at AfC Stone Hill Church of Princeton was accepted[edit]

Stone Hill Church of Princeton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jojo@nthony (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it up[edit]

The merger process for Princeton Evangelical Fellowship isn't over yet, but if it does end up being merged please don't let that get you down. That article is really well written, as is Stone Hill Church of Princeton. If half the articles on Wikipedia were written as well as those we'd be in a better place. Wikipedia needs more contributors like you, and I hope you'll continue contributing regardless of the merger outcome. I think your plan to improve existing articles while you get more familiar with notability is a good one. Once you come back to creating new articles, I don't you should bother with AfC; you'll be ready. Lagrange613 21:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement. I'll try my hand at improving some existing articles and see how things go. Djkeddie (talk) 21:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, since nobody seems to have bothered to come here and welcome you, let me offer a belated welcome to Wikipedia! You seem to be finding your way around just fine, but here's a welcome template full of helpful links anyway.

Hello, Djkeddie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, Lagrange613 21:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)}[reply]

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Your GA nomination of Pentemont Abbey[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pentemont Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pentemont Abbey[edit]

The article Pentemont Abbey you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pentemont Abbey for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for You![edit]

The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to bring Pentemont Abbey to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!  — ₳aron 17:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pentemont Abbey[edit]

The article Pentemont Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pentemont Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pentemont Abbey[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Arthur Ingersoll Meigs's picture and a picture of one of his buildings!! Are you able to take other pictures of the Princeton campus if I make specific requests please?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can absolutely take other photos of Princeton's campus if you have requests. I live in Princeton and work on campus and have been steadily taking photos of the town and campus. What would you like?Djkeddie (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Highfields (Amwell and Hopewell, New Jersey)[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Highfields (Amwell and Hopewell, New Jersey) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A subsequent review has been made, and there are additional issues that have noted. Please stop by as soon as you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Another review has uncovered another set of issues. Your prompt attention to this discussion would be appreciated. - Dravecky (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the editor[edit]

who started the Alexander Phimister Proctor article 10 years ago I was sad to see the pictured of my daughter be replaced. Well, such is the nature of "progress.' Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I meant no offense to your daughter.  :) Djkeddie (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saint-Louis-du-Louvre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre[edit]

The article Saint-Louis-du-Louvre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre[edit]

The article Saint-Louis-du-Louvre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:41, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Highfields (Amwell and Hopewell, New Jersey)[edit]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

French-American School of Princeton[edit]

Have you uploaded a photo of the French-American School of Princeton (75 Mapleton Rd, Princeton, NJ 08540) to Wikipedia?

BTW I'm trying to look for reliable secondary sources about this school. I found http://ford3.com/projects/Educational/French+American+School+of+Princeton but that is a page about the school's architecture. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a gallery of photos on that the property, the former St. Joseph's Seminary, on Wikimedia commons, Media related to St. Joseph's Seminary (Princeton, New Jersey) at Wikimedia Commons. For primary sources on the French-American school you could search the Papers of Princeton archive of local newspapers.Djkeddie (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Harold E. Wagoner[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harold E. Wagoner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Harold E. Wagoner[edit]

The article Harold E. Wagoner you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Harold E. Wagoner for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Princeton Station[edit]

Would you please weigh in at Talk:Princeton (NJT station) to help settle the station's NRHP status? Thanks. Djflem (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rider University[edit]

Hi! Have you thought about photographing Rider University?

In particular Memorial Hall would be nice since that is where the Japanese school holds its classes. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get down there some time and see what I can do. Djkeddie (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I managed to get down there today to take photos which are now on the commons, hope that helps Djkeddie (talk) 00:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Djkeddie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

template you used being discussed for deletion[edit]

The Template:Infobox urban feature is being discussed for deletion. Since you edited a page that used it, you may wish to comment at the discussion here. Alaney2k (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton High School Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princeton High School Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton Garden Theatre Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princeton Garden Theatre Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Djkeddie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Edwin Lutyens.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Edwin Lutyens.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PRISMS Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PRISMS Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton High School Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princeton High School Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating Harold E. Wagoner!Zigzig20s (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Djkeddie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Djkeddie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:J.C. Deagan, Inc. Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J.C. Deagan, Inc. Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton Tory.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princeton Tory.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hun School of Princeton Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hun School of Princeton Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]