User talk:Dnalrom123

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dnalrom123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pentrich[edit]

Can you explain your edit at Pentrich? Victuallers (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erm? How did you get from my comment above that I was going to delete your contribution or that I thought it was "my" page? I only welcomed you to wikipedia and then asked a question. Maybe its me who is misunderstanding. Pages don't belong to anyone. You can add what you will and then consensus decides what stays. I think you need to add a bit more as at present I couldn't work out what was what. Do ask if you need advice Victuallers (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought perhaps you had originally written the page and weren't happy with my edit and I took your question as having a "please explain yourself young lady, what do you think you're playing at" tone. I'm glad that was only a misunderstanding. I will try to elaborate a little more on my edit if you think it needs it.

Regards Dnalrom123 (talk) 17:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I never knew you were a young lady and should you not write it like this - The Morland Dynasty? Victuallers (talk) 19:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm almost 42 but never mind. I thought I had written it The Morland Dynasty! I definitely need to pull my socks up, don't I ;-)

Duchess of Richmond's ball[edit]

Thank you for your edit to your edit, but please do not sign additions to article pages, only sign comments to talk pages. --PBS (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Righto. I'm new to Wikipedia and obviously misunderstood someone else's advice ;-/. Dnalrom123 (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in The Restoration in fiction[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Restoration in fiction, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Restoration in fiction is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Restoration in fiction, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Restoration in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Restoration in fiction. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 15#The Restoration in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 20:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]