User talk:Docjp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My contribution to both education and mental health are the concepts created to articulate the Esoteric phenomena operating within the Whole Human Being, or WHB. Some of the terms and concepts that apply to the phenomena I refer to by the symbol "Esochology", which applies to numerous Esoteric operations naturally occurring within Man may be researched on my web site:<http://about-psychology.com>. These terms, symbols and concepts are also explained and discussed in my books: Death of Psychology That Nobody Noticed published by Publish America in 2007. Esochology and the Purpose of Life published by Publish America in 2009. In addition, more about Esochology can be obtained on my web site: <http://about-psychology.com/esochology.html>. I would enjoy discussing any aspect of the Esoteric within Man.----Docjp (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Docjp (talk) 20:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DanielRigal (talk) 22:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Insanity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DanielRigal (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC) --Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[[Question. I will of course "stop" contributing what I have discovered as a consequence of thirty years experience as an Esoteric psychotherapist, and as a consequence of 39 years pursuing a Spiritual path. What strikes me as strange is how my quoting from my own book would be acceptable, but conveying what I know directly is "adding commentary and ... personal analysis into articles". Is it beyond the grasp of those who are threatening to block me from Wikipedia that if Wikipedia has value, that value must lie in it remaining open to Truth... regardless of the format in which it is offered?--Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]